ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0846

Psychometric Evaluation and Measurement Invariance of English and French Versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study

Chelsea Rapoport1, Alyssa Choi2, Linda Kwakkenbos3, Marie-Eve Carrier4, Karen Gottesman5, Scott Roesch6, Brett Thombs7 and Vanessa Malcarne6, 1SDSU/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, La Jolla, CA, 2SDSU/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, 3Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5Scleroderma Foundation, Southern California Chapter, Danvers, MA, 6SDSU/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology; Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 7Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Measurement, psychosocial factors, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Research Methodology Poster (0846–0854)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Loneliness is a pervasive experience that has been associated with poorer health-related quality of life, and remains understudied in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). This study examined the psychometric properties of scores from the UCLA Loneliness Scale-6 (ULS-6; Neto, 1992), a self-report questionnaire not previously evaluated for SSc, and evaluated the equivalence of English and French versions.

Methods: This study used baseline data from 775 adults with SSc (89.9% female, 52.9% limited SSc, 66% English-speaking) enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the single-factor structure of the ULS-6. Internal consistency reliability was assessed via McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and convergent validity was examined via Pearson product-moment correlations with measures of depression symptoms (PHQ-8) and social support (OSSS-3), number of people in the household, and social interaction frequency. Multiple group CFA (MGCFA) was used to determine whether the single-factor structure was supported in English and French-speaking subgroups. The MIMIC model was used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) for English versus French versions.

Results: The mean score on the ULS-6 was 7.00 (SD = 4.76, range 0-18), with a higher score representing greater loneliness. The CFA supported the expected single-factor structure (CFI = .96, SRMR = .03), although the RMSEA = .11 suggested less than adequate model fit. All standardized factor loadings for items were large and statistically significant (.62 to .86, all ps < .001). Omega and alpha were both 0.87, indicating high reliability. The ULS-6 total score correlated significantly (all ps < .001) and in expected directions with the total score for the PHQ-8 (r = .56), the total score on the OSSS (r = -.53), and frequency of social interactions with one person (r = -.162) and multiple people (r = -.24), but did not correlate significantly with number of people in the household (r = -.058, p = .11). The MGCFA indicated that the configural invariance model best fit the data (Δχ2[8] = 56.14, p < .001), suggesting non-equivalent factor loadings between language subgroups. However, unstandardized (.72 to 1.39, all ps < .001) and standardized (.48 to .90, all ps < .001) factor loadings were positive and statistically significant. The overall MIMIC model fit well and suggested cross-language metric equivalence (CFI = .939, SRMR = .044, RMSEA = .11). Statistically significant DIF were found for three items across language, although standardized differences were small (β(item 2) = .14, p < .001, β(item 4) = -.14, p = .005, β(item 6) = .13, p < .001).

Conclusion: Analyses demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity of the ULS-6 scores in English- and French-speaking adults with SSc, supporting its use to examine comparative experiences of loneliness. Although half of the items showed DIF across linguistic groups and the MGCFA did not support factor loading invariance, there were few practical implications for the total scores derived. Future studies of the ULS-6 across linguistic groups are needed to establish invariance for use with diverse SSc populations.


Disclosures: C. Rapoport, None; A. Choi, None; L. Kwakkenbos, None; M. Carrier, None; K. Gottesman, None; S. Roesch, None; B. Thombs, None; V. Malcarne, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rapoport C, Choi A, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier M, Gottesman K, Roesch S, Thombs B, Malcarne V. Psychometric Evaluation and Measurement Invariance of English and French Versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/psychometric-evaluation-and-measurement-invariance-of-english-and-french-versions-of-the-ucla-loneliness-scale-in-systemic-sclerosis-a-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/psychometric-evaluation-and-measurement-invariance-of-english-and-french-versions-of-the-ucla-loneliness-scale-in-systemic-sclerosis-a-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology