ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2825

Provider Variability in Glucocorticoid Prescribing for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Impact on Chronic Glucocorticoid Use

Michael George1, Joshua Baker 2, Lang Chen 3, Qufei Wu 2, Fenglong Xie 4, Huifeng Yun 3 and Jeffrey Curtis 3, 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: glucocorticoids, prescribing trends and epidemiologic methods, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T109: Epidemiology & Public Health III: RA (2822–2827)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Glucocorticoids are recommended as short-term bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but as many as 30-40% of patients remain on glucocorticoids chronically. We aimed to measure the variability in the prescribing of glucocorticoids among rheumatologists and determine whether seeing a provider with a greater preference for glucocorticoids was independently associated with glucocorticoid use among patients on stable DMARD treatment.

Methods: Two cohorts were created using Medicare claims data 2006-2015. First, to measure provider variability, we identified patients with 2 diagnoses of RA within a given year who received methotrexate or a biologic. Patients could contribute to each year in which they fulfilled criteria. Among rheumatologists seeing at least 10 patients with RA in a given year, we defined the “provider preference” for glucocorticoids as the proportion of the provider’s patients receiving ≥30 days of oral glucocorticoids within 90 days of the first DMARD treatment of that year. Each year was evaluated separately to allow for changing practices over time. We then identified a separate cohort of patients with 2 diagnoses of RA who initiated methotrexate or a biologic and remained on stable DMARD therapy without biologic additions or changes for ≥6 months. We used logistic regression to determine if provider preference for glucocorticoids (measured in the larger cohort using all other patients seen by the same provider in the same year) was independently associated with a patient receiving glucocorticoids 3-6 months after the start of the DMARD course, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization.

Results: We identified 1,272,644 patient-year episodes among 385,597 unique patients. Among providers seeing ≥10 patients in a given year (28,936 provider-year combinations among 6,875 providers), the proportion of a physician’s patients receiving ≥30 days of glucocorticoids was highly variable even among providers with a large patient volume (Figure 1) [median 24.3%, IQR 16.7% to 33.3%]. We identified a separate cohort of 192,614 RA patients on stable DMARD treatment for at least 6 months (47% receiving biologics) for whom we could identify the treating rheumatologist and assign a provider preference for glucocorticoids (calculated among all other patients seen by the same rheumatologist that year in the larger cohort). Provider preference for glucocorticoids was highly associated with receiving glucocorticoids 3-6 months after beginning the current DMARD course, with predicted probability ranging from 34.4% (95% CI 33.9-34.8) for patients seen by providers in the lowest quintile to 60.6% (95% CI 60.1-61.1) for those seen by providers in the highest quintile (Figure 2, all p < 0.001; first stage regression R2 0.055, F 1597).

Conclusion: Glucocorticoids prescribing practices for RA vary widely between rheumatologists. Provider preference for the use of glucocorticoids can help predict whether a patient remains on glucocorticoids during treatment. These data support the use of provider preference as an instrumental variable for epidemiologic studies evaluating glucocorticoid risk.

Figure 1: Variability in rheumatologist glucocorticoid prescribing for rheumatoid arthritis. Each circle represents a rheumatologist, with rheumatologists contributing a separate observation for each year they have seen at least 10 RA patients. The proportion of the rheumatologist’s patients receiving at least 30 days of oral glucocorticoids within 90 days of the first DMARD prescription of each year is shown.

Figure 2: Predicted probability of a patient with RA on stable DMARD treatment receiving oral glucocorticoids 3-6 months after starting their DMARD course, calculated from a logistic regression model including their rheumatologist’s preference for glucocorticoids in quintiles -see Figure 1- and covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization measures -error bars obscured by markers, all p < 0.001-.


Disclosure: M. George, AbbVie, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; J. Baker, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Burns-White LLC, 5; L. Chen, None; Q. Wu, None; F. Xie, None; H. Yun, BMS, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Pfizer, 2; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corrona, Lilly, Janssen, Myriad, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Amgen Inc., 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Crescendo, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Janseen, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Lilly, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Insitute (PCORI), 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Radius Health, Inc., 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 3, 5, Roche/Genentech, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

George M, Baker J, Chen L, Wu Q, Xie F, Yun H, Curtis J. Provider Variability in Glucocorticoid Prescribing for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Impact on Chronic Glucocorticoid Use [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-variability-in-glucocorticoid-prescribing-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-impact-on-chronic-glucocorticoid-use/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-variability-in-glucocorticoid-prescribing-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-impact-on-chronic-glucocorticoid-use/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology