ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1049

Provider Characteristics and Beliefs and Patient Factors Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Michael George1, George Reed2, Kevin Kane3, Dimitrios Pappas4 and Joel Kremer5, 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 4CorEvitas, New York, NY, 5The Corrona Research Foundation, Delray Beach, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: glucocorticoids, health behaviors, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1038–1054) Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Guidelines recommend limiting glucocorticoid (GC) use in RA, but 30% of patients continue long-term GCs. Little is known about the influence of provider attitudes and characteristics on prescribing patterns. We conducted a provider survey nested within a RA registry to identify provider factors associated with GC use.

Methods: A survey was sent to providers contributing patients to the prospective, observational, CorEvitas Rheumatoid Arthritis registry, capturing demographics, provider concerns about the safety of different medications, and a range of healthcare-related and non-healthcare related beliefs. We then identified patients with RA initiating a new biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) who remained on the same therapy at a 6 month follow-up visit, using the first qualifying observation per patient. Patient factors associated with GC use 6 months after treatment initiation were assessed using a mixed effects logistic regression model clustered by provider. Similar models limited to patients of the survey responders assessed whether different provider characteristics and beliefs were associated with GC prescribing 6 months after treatment initiation, adjusting for patient factors. All models were weighted for number of patients per provider.

Results: Among 256 active providers contributing patients to the registry, 92 (36%) responded to the survey and 81 had patients meeting all inclusion criteria. These 81 responders had 3966 qualifying patients, while 164 non-responders had 3219 qualifying patients. Among all 7185 patients, higher baseline disease activity, less improvement at 6 months, age ≤45 or >75, more long-standing RA, more previous biologics/JAKi, and earlier calendar year were associated with greater GC use at 6 months (Table 1). Patients of survey responders were less likely to use GCs (OR 0.68, CI 0.049-0.94), and 13% of the variability in GC use was due to provider. In analyses limited to survey responders: provider demographics, burnout, and beliefs regarding shared decision making, complementary/alternative medications, race as a biologic factor in medicine, political leanings, and religiosity were not associated with GC prescribing (Table 2). As shown in Figure 1, concerns about long-term prednisone ≤5mg or >5mg or opioids were not associated with GC prescribing, but providers with less concern about biologics or JAKi were more likely to prescribe GCs at 6 months [adjusted OR 2.34 (1.15-4.76) for biologics, OR 2.52 (1.36-4.65) for JAKi for slightly/not at all vs. very much concerned].

Conclusion: While patient factors have a strong influence on GC use in RA, variability in practice patterns among providers also impacts GC use. Many provider characteristics and beliefs, and surprisingly even concerns about GCs, are not associated with GC prescribing. In contrast, providers with less concern about biologics and JAKi are more likely to prescribe GCs. These results suggest that broader attitudes towards prioritizing treatment benefits vs risks may drive GC prescribing, with important implications for provider education.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. George: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Janssen, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5; G. Reed: CorEviitas, LLC, 2, Corrona Research Foundation, 2; K. Kane: None; D. Pappas: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, CorEvitas, Part of Thermofisher, 3, 11, Corrona Research Foundation, a not-for-profit 501(c)3 foundation, 4, Novartis, 2, Roche, 2; J. Kremer: CorEvitas (part of ThermoFisher), 1, Corrona Research Foundation, a not-for-profit 501(c)3 foundation, 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

George M, Reed G, Kane K, Pappas D, Kremer J. Provider Characteristics and Beliefs and Patient Factors Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-characteristics-and-beliefs-and-patient-factors-associated-with-long-term-glucocorticoid-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-characteristics-and-beliefs-and-patient-factors-associated-with-long-term-glucocorticoid-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology