ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2797

Prospective Validation of a Panel of Autoantibodies in Combination with C4d-Bound Complement Activation Products for the Differential Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Daniel J Wallace1, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman2, Anca D. Askanase3, Susan Manzi4, Joseph Ahearn5, Richard Furie6, Arthur Weinstein7, Chaim Putterman8, Elena Massarotti9, Christopher Collins10, Kenneth Kalunian11, Cristina Arriens12, Stuart L. Silverman13, Smitha Reddy14, Puja Chitkara15, Claudia Ibarra16, Derren Barken17, Roberta Alexander18, John Conklin19 and Thierry Dervieux20, 1Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2FSM, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 3Medicine, Rheumatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 4Lupus Center of Excellence, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Allegheny Singer Research Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 6North Shore University Hospital, Great Neck, NY, 7Rheumatology Section, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 8Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, 9Rheumatology, Immunology, & Allergy, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hosp, Boston, MA, 10MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 11Center for Innovative Therapy, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 12Arthritis & Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 13Cedars, Beverly Hills, CA, 14Arthritis Care and Research Center, Inc., Poway, CA, 15Rheumatology, Center For Arthritis and Rheumatologic Excellence, Chula Vista, CA, 16Clinical Laboratory, Exagen Diagnostics, Vista, CA, 17Exagen Diagnostics, Vista, CA, 18Research & Development, Exagen Diagnostics, Vista, CA, 191261 Liberty Way Suite C, Exagen Diagnostics, Vista, CA, 20Research and Development, Exagen Diagnostics, Vista, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: complement, diagnosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III: Biomarkers and Nephritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

A panel of autoantibodies in combination with C4d-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs, EC4d and BC4d) has been established as a sensitive and specific testing method for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to prospectively establish the performance characteristics of this testing method in an independent cohort of SLE subjects relative to subjects with diseases other than SLE.

Methods:

This cross-sectional prospective diagnostic validation study enrolled consented adult subjects at 12 sites across the USA. Venous blood was collected and transported overnight to a CAP-accredited reference clinical laboratory. The testing logic relied on two consecutive Tiers. In Tier 1, positivity for any of 4-lupus specific markers (inclusive of anti-dsDNA as confirmed by Crithidia, anti-Smith, and EC4d or BC4d levels above the 99th percentile of a control group) resulted a Tier-1 positive test assessment. All Tier-1 negative results were analyzed in a Tier 2, to yield a Tier-2 index score. This Tier-2 index score was inclusive of an ANA component, a CB-CAPs component (as component for complement activation), and a third component composite of autoantibodies for diseases other than SLE. Tier 2 positive test results (index score ≥0.1) were combined with Tier 1 positive test results to yield the overall two-tiered positive test results. Negative test results all presented with an index score lower than 0.1. All testing personnel were blinded to disease diagnosis throughout the study. Test performances in this independent validation cohort were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive (+) and negative (-) likelihood ratio (LR) the later reported with confidence intervals (CI).

Results:

A total of 476 adult subjects inclusive of 184 subjects with SLE (all meeting the 1982 ACR criteria revised in 1997), 215 subjects with auto-immune rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases (inclusive of 77 subjects with autoimmune thyroiditis or hepatitis, 107 subjects with rheumatoid arthritis and 31 subjects with other rheumatic diseases) and a group of 77 subjects with primary fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) were enrolled. Tier 1 yielded 45% sensitivity for SLE and 98% specificity in distinguishing SLE from other diseases (LR+: 24.6 [CI95%: 10.1-59.5]), LR-: 0.56 [CI95%: 0.49-0.64]). Tier 2 yielded 48% sensitivity and 91% specificity in distinguishing SLE from other diseases (LR+: 5.6 [CI95%: 3.6-8.8], LR-: 0.56 [CI95%: 0.46-0.69]). All together the performance characteristics of the two-tiered diagnostic method yielded 72% sensitivity for SLE and 90% specificity in distinguishing SLE from other diseases (LR+: 7.0 [CI95%: 4.9-10.0], LR-: 0.32 [CI95: 0.25-0.40]).

Conclusion:

These data indicate that a panel of autoantibodies in combination with C4d-bound complement activation products is sensitive and specific for SLE.


Disclosure: D. J. Wallace, Exagen, 2; R. Ramsey-Goldman, exagen, 2; A. D. Askanase, anca askanase, 2; S. Manzi, exagen, 2; J. Ahearn, exagen, 2; R. Furie, exagen, 2; A. Weinstein, exagen, 6; C. Putterman, exagen, 2; E. Massarotti, Exagen, 2; C. Collins, Exagen, 2; K. Kalunian, Exagen, 2; C. Arriens, Exagen, 2; S. L. Silverman, Exagen, 2; S. Reddy, Exagen, 2; P. Chitkara, exagen, 2; C. Ibarra, Exagen, 3; D. Barken, Exagen, 3; R. Alexander, exagen, 3; J. Conklin, Exagen, 3; T. Dervieux, Exagen, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wallace DJ, Ramsey-Goldman R, Askanase AD, Manzi S, Ahearn J, Furie R, Weinstein A, Putterman C, Massarotti E, Collins C, Kalunian K, Arriens C, Silverman SL, Reddy S, Chitkara P, Ibarra C, Barken D, Alexander R, Conklin J, Dervieux T. Prospective Validation of a Panel of Autoantibodies in Combination with C4d-Bound Complement Activation Products for the Differential Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-validation-of-a-panel-of-autoantibodies-in-combination-with-c4d-bound-complement-activation-products-for-the-differential-diagnosis-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-validation-of-a-panel-of-autoantibodies-in-combination-with-c4d-bound-complement-activation-products-for-the-differential-diagnosis-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology