ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 143

Proposed Gout Treatment Guidelines and Meeting Serum Urate and Flare Goals

Jasvinder A. Singh1, David Hagerty2, Chris Storgard3, Robert Mischler4 and Robert Morlock4, 1Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 2Medical, Ardea Bioscience, San Diego, CA, 34939 Directors Place, Ardea Bioscience, San Diego, CA, 4Ardea Bioscience, San Diego, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, hyperuricemia and quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Although gout is a relatively common condition, treatment is often not ideal with many patients continuing to experience multiple flares and some developing complications associated with the disease.   To improve patient care the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recently proposed a draft set of recommendations for treating patients with gout. The purpose of this study is to assess the percentage of patients that meet the recently proposed treatment guidelines and the impact of following guideline recommendations on reaching serum uric acid (sUA) and flare targets.

Methods: Data were assessed from a quantitative survey of US physicians about gout disease management. Laboratory and clinical data were confirmed through chart audits using a structured case report form.   The sample was restricted to patients treated with allopurinol or febuxostat. Xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor and initial dose, use of prophylactic medication, sUA level, physician type (rheumatologist vs. primary care physician [PCP]), patient socio-demographics factors, and flare rates (treatment and non-treatment related) were recorded/abstracted.  Descriptive statistics were used to describe quality indicators consisting of the number of patients initiating XO inhibitor therapy with anti-inflammatory prophylaxis medication, titration of allopurinol and having multiple sUA assessments.  A multivariate model was used to assess the impact of patient, clinician, and quality indicators on achieving sUA < 6 and < 1 flare over a 12-month period.

Results: The sample included 125 rheumatologists and 124 PCPs. Of the 1,245 patients with gout, 858 (69%) were treated with a XO inhibitor: 621 (72.4%) were treated with allopurinol and 237 (27.6%) were treated with febuxostat.  Rheumatologists managed the care for 500 (58.3%) patients and PCPs managed the care for 358 (41.7%) patients. Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis treatment was used in 67% of cases treated by rheumatologists and only 37% of cases treated by PCPs.  Multiple sUA assessments over a 12-month period were done in 68% and 53% of patients managed by rheumatologists and PCPs, respectively.  Allopurinol dose was titrated above 300mg in 8% of patients treated by a PCP and 29% of patients treated by rheumatologists (p<0.01).  Only 25% of patients obtained sUA < 6 and reported < 1 flare per year.   Controlling for confounding factors, a multivariate model found quality indicators for the use of prophylaxis flare prevention at treatment initiation, multiple sUA assessments and physician type as predictive of achieving sUA and flare goals.

Conclusion: Only 25% of patients reach sUA < 6 and < 1 flare over a 12-month period.   Adherence to draft ACR guidelines vary by physician type.  Patients receiving guideline recommended care are more likely to achieve treatment goals, yet, significant opportunities exist to improve care for the majority patients regardless of physician specialty, including use of prophylactic treatment, dose titration of urate-lowering therapy and/or effective treatment strategies to bring patients to sUA goal and eliminating flares.


Disclosure:

J. A. Singh,

Research and travel grants from Takeda, Savient, Wyeth and Amgen,

2,

Honoraria from Abbott,

9,

Consultant fees from URL Pharma, Savient, Takeda, ArdeaBioscience, Allergan and Novartis.,

5;

D. Hagerty,

Ardea Bioscience,

3,

Ardea Bioscience,

1;

C. Storgard,

Ardea,

3,

Ardea,

1;

R. Mischler,

Adea Bioscience,

3,

Ardea Bioscience,

1;

R. Morlock,

Ardea Bioscience,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/proposed-gout-treatment-guidelines-and-meeting-serum-urate-and-flare-goals/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology