ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1693

Progressive Disease in Systemic Sclerosis after One Year of Follow-up;  Results of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Health Care Program

Jessica Meijs1, Anne Schouffoer2, Nina Ajmone Marsan3, Lucia Kroft4, Maarten K. Ninaber5, T.W.J. Huizinga1 and Jeska K. De Vries-Bouwstra1, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4Deparment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 5Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Health Care, prognostic factors, systemic sclerosis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics: Systemic Sclerosis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate disease course of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients participating in a single centre multidisciplinary health-care program over one year of follow-up, and to evaluate which baseline variables discriminate patients with progressive disease.

Methods: Baseline characteristics and one year follow-up results from patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (DcSSc), or limited (cutaneous) SSc (L(c)SSc) referred to the multidisciplinary health-care program were evaluated. Progressive disease was defined as: SSc-related decease, decrease of ≥10% of forced vital capacity (FVC), decrease of ≥15% of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), decrease of ≥10% of body weight, decrease of ≥ 30% of estimated glomerular filtration rate, increase of ≥30% modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (with D ≥3) or ≥0.25 increase of Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire. The number of patients with progressive disease was determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between baseline characteristics and presence of progressive disease. Discriminative ability of the multivariable model was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.

Results: Between April 2009 and January 2014 303 SSc patients were referred to the health-care program, of which 164 underwent re-evaluation after one year (mean 13.5, range 10-23 months). Sixty-six patients (38% of 172) had progressive disease, including 8 patients who died ≤18 months after first evaluation. Progressive disease was found in 27 (33%) patients with DcSSc, 32 (50%) with LcSSc, and seven (26%) with LSSc (Table 1). Type of skin involvement, mRSS and disease duration could not independently discriminate progressive patients. Multivariable analysis showed that friction rubs and proximal muscular weakness were most significantly associated with progressive disease, additional to type of SSc, age, gender, disease duration, autoantibody profile and use of immunosuppressive therapy. The multivariable model showed fair discrimination (AUC 0.718 [95% CI 0.636-0.800]).

Conclusion: Thirty-eight percent of SSc patients showed progressive disease after one year follow-up, with highest frequency of progression among patients with LcSSc. The strongest predictors of progressive disease were friction rubs and proximal muscular weakness; pattern of skin involvement and disease duration were not independently discriminative. These observations underline the relevance of strict follow-up in all SSc patients as well as the need for more effective treatment strategies. 

 

Table 1. Progressive disease in SSc according to subtype of SSc

Progression, N (%)

Total

DcSSc

LcSSc

LSSc

 

N = 172*

N=81

N=64

N=27

SSc-related decease

8 (5)

3 (4)

4 (6)

1 (4)

≥ 10% decrease in body weight

9 (5)

5 (6)

2 (3)

2 (7)

≥ 30% increase with minimum of D3 in MRSS

21 (12)

10 (12)

10 (16)

1 (4)

≥ 30% decrease in eGFR

6 (3)

3 (4)

3 (5)

0 (0)

≥ 10% decrease in FVC

13 (8)

3 (4)

6 (9)

4 (15)

≥ 15% decrease in DLCO

12 (7)

5 (6)

6 (9)

1 (4)

≥ 0.25 increase in SHAQ

11 (6)

3 (4)

8 (13)

0 (0)

Total patients with progressive disease

66 (38)

27 (33)

32 (50)

7 (26)

*124 (72%) patients fulfilled the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria at baseline evaluation

DcSSc: diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; LcSSc: limited cutaneous systemic

sclerosis; MRSS: modified Rodnan Skin Score; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate;

FVC: forced vital capacity; DLCO: diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide;

SHAQ: Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.

 


Disclosure:

J. Meijs,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals,

2;

A. Schouffoer,
None;

N. Ajmone Marsan,
None;

L. Kroft,
None;

M. K. Ninaber,
None;

T. W. J. Huizinga,
None;

J. K. De Vries-Bouwstra,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/progressive-disease-in-systemic-sclerosis-after-one-year-of-follow-up-results-of-a-standardized-multidisciplinary-health-care-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology