ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1570

Prognostic Assessment of the 2022 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis: A Multi-centre International Study

Emma Rinaldi1, Corrado Campochiaro2, Roberto Padoan3, Chengappa Kavadichanda4, Augustine Jose4, Kritika Singh5, Luca Iorio3, Naomi Viapiana6, Upendra Rathore5, Elena Marina Baldissera6, Vikas Agarwal5, Lorenzo Dagna7, Durga P Misra5 and Alessandro Tomelleri8, 1Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, 2IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Disease. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, 3Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 4Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India, 5Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India, 6IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, 7Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy, 8Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: prognostic factors, Takayasu.s arteritis, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1554–1578) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) rely on a point-based clinical and imaging scoring system (from 0 to 22). The aim of this study is to investigate whether the baseline cumulative score and the fulfillment of each item included in the score correlate with the long-term prognosis of TAK patients.

Methods: Data of TAK patients from 4 centres (2 from Italy; 2 from India) were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, the score provided by the 2022 classification criteria was calculated and the following outcomes were evaluated: glucocorticoid (GC) suspension, need of conventional and biologic DMARDs (cs- and bDMARDs) introduction, need of vascular procedures. Data on bDMARDs were retrieved only from the Italian cohorts. Correlation of these outcomes with the cumulative baseline score and with single item fulfillment was assessed. Additionally, the correlation between baseline ACR/EULAR 2022 score and disease activity indexes (i.e., DEI.Tak, ITAS2010) was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses and Spearman correlation analyses were performed as appropriate.

Results: We included 407 patients (163 from Italy; 244 from India) with a median follow-up of 80 (IQR, 37-143) months. Mean baseline score was 10.1 ± 3.5 and 378 (92.9%) patients were classified as TAK according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria. GCs were started in 348 patients (85.5%) and suspended in 110 (31.6%) after a median of 43 (IQR, 23-87) months. csDMARDs were started in 331 patients (81.3%) after a median of 1 (IQR, 0-5) month. bDMARDs were started in 108 patients (66.3%) after a median of 16 (IQR 8.8-39) months. Vascular procedures were performed in 101 patients (24.8%). Mean baseline DEI.Tak and ITAS2010 scores were 8.8 ± 5.5 and 10.4 ± 6.6, respectively. A higher baseline cumulative score was negatively associated with GC suspension (OR 0.901 [95%CI 0.844-0.962], p=0.002) and positively associated with csDMARD introduction (OR 1.102 [95%CI 1.027-1.184] p=0.007). No correlation with bDMARD start and vascular procedures was found. Table 1 shows the association of each item with different outcomes. At multivariate analysis, difference in blood pressure ≥20 mmHg and abdominal aorta + renal/mesenteric involvement were negative predictors of GC suspension; limb claudication and carotid abnormalities were predictors of csDMARD introduction. Angina/ischemic cardiac pain was predictor of need for vascular procedure, conversely to carotid abnormalities. Finally, a higher score strongly correlated with both baseline DEI.Tak (rho=0.549, p< 0.001) and ITAS2010 (rho=0.575, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: A higher baseline score obtained from the ACR/EULAR 2022 TAK classification criteria was associated with a more aggressive disease course. No specific item was associated with disease prognosis. At baseline, the ACR/EULAR 2022 score might be a surrogate of disease activity scores.

Supporting image 1

Table 1 legend.
Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses evaluating the association of each item with different outcomes


Disclosures: E. Rinaldi: None; C. Campochiaro: Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, Novartis, 1, 6; R. Padoan: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6; C. Kavadichanda: None; A. Jose: None; K. Singh: None; L. Iorio: None; N. Viapiana: None; U. Rathore: None; E. Baldissera: None; V. Agarwal: None; L. Dagna: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, biogen, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, galapagos, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 2, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, SOBI, 2, 5, 6; D. Misra: None; A. Tomelleri: Novartis, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rinaldi E, Campochiaro C, Padoan R, Kavadichanda C, Jose A, Singh K, Iorio L, Viapiana N, Rathore U, Baldissera E, Agarwal V, Dagna L, Misra D, Tomelleri A. Prognostic Assessment of the 2022 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis: A Multi-centre International Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prognostic-assessment-of-the-2022-acr-eular-classification-criteria-for-takayasu-arteritis-a-multi-centre-international-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prognostic-assessment-of-the-2022-acr-eular-classification-criteria-for-takayasu-arteritis-a-multi-centre-international-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology