ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 197

Process Evaluation of the Making It Work Program, an Online Program to Help People with Inflammatory Arthritis Remain Employed

Kathy Tran1, Xi yuan Li2, Xiang Chuin Seah3, Catherine Backman4, Brendan vanAs3, Pam Rogers2, Monique Gignac5, John M. Esdaile3, Carter Thorne6, Linda Li2 and Diane Lacaille7, 1Simon Fraser University, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 2Rheumatology, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 4Rehab Medicine, University of British Columbia, Richmond, BC, Canada, 5Instititue for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University of Toronto, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 7University of British Columbia, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Employment, inflammatory arthritis, online patient engagement and self-management

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Inflammatory arthritis (IA) commonly affects ability to work, yet few arthritis services exist addressing employment. We report on the process evaluation of the Making it Work program, an online self-management program to help people with IA deal with employment issues, performed in the context of a RCT testing its effectiveness at preventing work disability and improving at-work productivity.

Methods: Participants, recruited from rheumatology practices, a consumer organization (Arthritis Consumer Experts) and advertisements, were eligible if they had IA, were currently employed, aged 18-59, concerned about their ability to work. The program consists of five e-learning modules; five on-line group meetings using video conferencing led by a vocational rehabilitation counsellor (VRC); individual consults with an occupational therapist (OT) for an ergonomic work assessment and with a VRC.

Results:

All program participants by 06/17 were included (N=236) [80% female, mean(SD) age: 45(10) years, RA:52%, AS:19%, PsA:15%, SLE:14%]. All participants Jan-Dec 2016 completed a feedback survey post program (n=69). Group meetings were successfully conducted online. Overall, participation was good. Median(25;75Q) no. group meetings attended: 4(3;5), with highest attendance in the first (86%) and lowest in the fourth (63%) meetings. Reasons for not attending included work obligations, health issues, family commitments, or other time constraints. 91% and 88% met with the OT and VRC. Completion of e-learning modules [Median(25;75Q) % of total slides viewed] ranged from 73(0-100)% for module 4, to 100(30;100)% for modules 1 & 2. Not all content is relevant to all, depending on disease and job characteristics.

Overall, participants were highly satisfied with the program. 94% would recommend it to others. Median [25Q;75Q] usefulness ratings (0-10, 0=not at all, 10=very useful) were: 8 [7;10] for online modules; 9[7.5;10] for group meetings; 8 [7;10] each for ergonomic & VRC assessments. Median time to complete each module was 60 min. Satisfaction with online group meetings was high: 93% were satisfied with facilitation; 87% with group dynamic; 84% were comfortable with the online format. Median [25Q;75Q] ratings (1-10) for ability to follow group discussion: 10 [9;10]; getting to know other participants: 7 [7;10]; feeling listened to and understood: 9 [8;10]; feeling that group was supportive: 9 [7;10].

Conclusion:

Overall, online delivery of the Making it Work program was feasible and participants were highly satisfied. Our study demonstrates that self-management programs can be successfully delivered using an online format, which facilitates wider dissemination, greater convenience to patients, and lower costs.


Disclosure: K. Tran, None; X. Y. Li, None; X. C. Seah, None; C. Backman, None; B. vanAs, None; P. Rogers, None; M. Gignac, None; J. M. Esdaile, None; C. Thorne, None; L. Li, None; D. Lacaille, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tran K, Li XY, Seah XC, Backman C, vanAs B, Rogers P, Gignac M, Esdaile JM, Thorne C, Li L, Lacaille D. Process Evaluation of the Making It Work Program, an Online Program to Help People with Inflammatory Arthritis Remain Employed [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/process-evaluation-of-the-making-it-work-program-an-online-program-to-help-people-with-inflammatory-arthritis-remain-employed/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/process-evaluation-of-the-making-it-work-program-an-online-program-to-help-people-with-inflammatory-arthritis-remain-employed/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology