ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0332

Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States: Updated Population Representative Estimates from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2016-2018

Michael Pollack1, Sandra Sze-jung Wu1, Eilleen Farrelly2, Shannon Grabich3 and Robert Ortmann4, 1AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, 2Xcenda, Carrollton, TX, 3Xcenda, Durham, NC, 4AstraZeneca, Greenwood, IN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Epidemiology, population studies, Prevalence, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Diagnosis (0323–0356)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multi-organ, autoimmune disease whose prevalence in the US has not been recently updated in real-world studies. Prevalence estimates range from 50-150 per 100,000 adults in the US, but these estimates are due to be refreshed. In addition, the heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations of SLE and lack of a diagnostic test make SLE prevalence challenging to quantify. Therefore, our study sought to utilize recent nationally representative population data to estimate prevalence estimates of SLE in the US.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 2016 – 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS), an annual survey using a complex sampling strategy to represent the US civilian non-institutionalized population. Prevalence was defined as self-reported SLE diagnosis with additional SLE-related medication use and/or any rheumatologist visit during the calendar year. Two other SLE diagnostic criteria were used as a sensitivity analysis (sensitive: SLE diagnosis only; restrictive: SLE diagnosed and currently treated). Self-reported SLE was linked to a specific visit to a healthcare professional (outpatient or inpatient). The annual prevalence was reported per 100,000 US adults and 95 % confidence interval (CI) stratified by key demographic characteristics.

Results: From 2016-2018, 96,996 adults reported annual data in MEPS, of which 199 (0.20%) reported SLE diagnosis, 154 (0.16%) respondents report SLE with either SLE-related medication and/or rheumatologist visit, and 139 (0.14%) respondents reported SLE with SLE-related medication. The pooled weighted annual prevalence of SLE using each respective SLE-definition was 261 ( 95% CI: 203, 319); 195 (95% CI: 149, 242) and 168 (95% CI: 130, 206) per 100,000 adults. From 2016 to 2018, the prevalence of SLE appeared to increase slightly. The prevalence of SLE was about 9 times higher in females compared to males (343 vs. 37 per 100,000 adults). Individuals who reported Black or multiple races and Mexican Hispanic ethnicity appeared to have a higher prevalence of SLE compared to white or non-Hispanic adults, respectively. Respondents with public insurance (Medicare or Medicaid) were twice as likely to report SLE than those privately insured (311 vs. 168 per 100,000 adults). Respondents in the Southern region of the US had a slightly higher prevalence of SLE compared to other regions (North, West, or East). The 95% confidence intervals were relatively wide across most stratified analyses, limiting the ability to detect population differences.

Conclusion: The self-reported SLE prevalence in the US was higher across all three disease definitions in MEPS than the currently accepted estimate of 50 to 150 per 100,000 adults. Similar to other studies, females, Black, and Hispanic respondents were found to have a higher prevalence of SLE compared to males and white or non-Hispanic individuals. While many real-world studies include only single-payer populations, we demonstrate a more diverse payer patient-population and a higher burden of SLE. SLE prevalence is challenging to quantify; however, this study suggests that the actual US of SLE prevalence may be higher than reported.


Disclosures: M. Pollack, AstraZeneca, LP., 3; S. Sze-jung Wu, AstraZeneca, 3; E. Farrelly, AstraZeneca, 2; S. Grabich, AstraZeneca, 2; R. Ortmann, AstraZeneca, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pollack M, Sze-jung Wu S, Farrelly E, Grabich S, Ortmann R. Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States: Updated Population Representative Estimates from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2016-2018 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-the-united-states-updated-population-representative-estimates-from-the-medical-expenditure-panel-survey-meps-2016-2018/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-the-united-states-updated-population-representative-estimates-from-the-medical-expenditure-panel-survey-meps-2016-2018/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology