ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1623

Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Assessed By a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Battery

Zahi Touma1, Robin Green2, Carmela Tartaglia3, Lesley Ruttan4, Sabrina Lombardi4, Nicole Anderson5, Jiandong Su6, Kenneth Colosimo6, Michelle Vitti6, Dennisse Bonilla6, Joan E. Wither5, Marvin J. Fritzler7 and Dorcas Beaton8, 1Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Division of Rheumatology, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Brain and Therapeutics, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Krembil Neurosciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 8Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction, measure and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II: Damage and Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a common neurobehavioural manifestation of SLE. In our recent systematic review, the prevalence of CI was 38% (95% CI: 33-43%) with a wide variation (15-79%), which may be due to differences in CI definitions and selection of neuropsychological tests across studies.  We aim to report the prevalence of CI in a large cohort using a comprehensive battery (CB) of tests in which we operationalized the classification of CI.

 

Methods: Consecutive consenting SLE patients, aged 18-65 years, who attended a single center (Jul 2016-Apr 2017) were recruited.  Patients were administered a CB that evaluates the major cognitive domains: Manual motor speed and dexterity, simple attention and processing speed, visual-spatial construction, verbal fluency, learning and memory (visuospatial and memory), executive functioning (untimed and timed).

Patient scores were compared to a normative sample of age- and gender-matched healthy controls to obtain z-scores. CI was operationalized on the CB as a z-score of ≤-1.5 (as compared to controls) on ≥2 domains, z ≤-2.0 on ≥1 domain or either.  Descriptive statistics were used.

 

Results: Of the 105 patients (91% female), the mean age at SLE diagnosis was 28.4 ± 10.2 and disease duration at enrolment was 15.0 ± 10.1 years. The prevalence of CI was 40.0% (z≤-1.5 in ≥2 domains), 44.8% (z≤-2.0 in ≥1 domains) and 55.2% for either.  

Prevalence of patients with domain z-scores of ≤-1.5 and ≤-2.0 varied from 7.6-49.5% and 0-24.8% respectively (Fig 1). The most affected domain was learning and memory (visuospatial and memory) in 52 (49.5%) patients based on z≤-1.5 on ≥ 2 subtests and 26 (24.8%) patients based on z≤-2.0 in ≥ 1 subtest.  

The prevalence of patients with subtest z-scores of ≤-1.5 and ≤-2.0 from 2.3-44.4% and 0.0-32.2% respectively (Table 1).

 

Conclusion: Prevalence of CI using our CB ranged between 40.0-44.8 % (z≤-1.5 in ≥2 domains and z≤-2.0 in ≥1 domains respectively) and 55.2% for either, which was higher than the pooled prevalence from previous reports of 38% .  These differences in CI prevalence across studies could be attributed to different factors including the heterogeneity in patients’ demographics/comorbidities, sample size, the use of different metrics to determine CI, and the lack of a standardized definition of CI. Further studies are required to identify the best definition for CI and its metrics.

 

Table 1. Prevalence of patients with subtest z-scores of ≤-1.5 and ≤-2.0 (n=105)

Domains

Comprehensive Battery Subtest

No. (%) of Patients that scored z≤-1.5

No. (%) of Patients that scored z≤-2.0

Manual motor speed and dexterity

Finger Tapping Test

    Dominant Hand

    Non-Dominant Hand

 

40 (44.4)

33 (37.1)

 

29 (32.2)

22 (24.7)

Simple attention and processing speed 

Trails A

Stroop colour naming

Stroop word reading

11 (10.7)

7 (6.7)

10 (9.5)

2 (1.9)

3 (2.9)

3 (2.9)

Visual-spatial construction

RCFT Copy 

30 (29.1)

23 (22.3)

Verbal fluency

COWAT

ANIMALS

12 (11.4)

7 (7.2)

6 (5.7)

4 (4.1)

Learning and memory:

Visuospatial

 

Verbal

 

RCFT Delay Recall

RCFT Delay Recognition

HVLT-R Delayed Recall

HVLT-R Recognition

HVLT-R total recall

 

29 (28.4)

16 (15.8)

32(31.7)

34 (33.7)

41 (40.6)

 

17 (16.7)

10 (9.9)

23 (22.8)

24 (23.8)

18 (17.8)

Executive functioning:

Untimed

 

 

 

 

Executive timed

 

Stroop (interference score)

WAIS Letter-Number

Consonant Trigrams (used lower value from 18 second or 36 second)

WAIS-III Digit Symbol

Trails B

 

2 (2.3)

3 (2.9)

14(13.3)

 

5 (4.8)

20 (19.4)

 

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

9(8.6)

 

0 (0.0)

6 (5.8)

Number of patients with z-scores ≤-1.5 include patients with z-scores ≤-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: Z. Touma, None; R. Green, None; C. Tartaglia, None; L. Ruttan, None; S. Lombardi, None; N. Anderson, None; J. Su, None; K. Colosimo, None; M. Vitti, None; D. Bonilla, None; J. E. Wither, None; M. J. Fritzler, Inova Diagnostics, Inc., 5; D. Beaton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Green R, Tartaglia C, Ruttan L, Lombardi S, Anderson N, Su J, Colosimo K, Vitti M, Bonilla D, Wither JE, Fritzler MJ, Beaton D. Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Assessed By a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Battery [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-cognitive-impairment-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-assessed-by-a-comprehensive-neuropsychological-battery/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-cognitive-impairment-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-assessed-by-a-comprehensive-neuropsychological-battery/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology