ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1802

Prevalence of CMV in the Ohio State University Lupus Population

Brian LaMoreaux1, Alexa Meara2, Holly Steigelman3, Juliette Yedimenko4, Wael N. Jarjour5 and Stacy P. Ardoin6, 1Rheumatology, Fellow, Columbus, OH, 2Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 3The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 4S2056, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 5Department of Rheumatology/Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 6Pediatric & Adult Rheumatology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Clinical practice, immunosuppressants, infection and laboratory tests, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Damage Accrual and Quality of Life

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) is a clinically variable autoimmune disease occurring predominantly in women of childbearing age. SLE treatment can range from close clinical monitoring to potent systemic immunosuppressive therapy. CMV is a common, endemic virus endemic that half of the United States population has been exposed to. Patients on immunosuppressive medications are at higher risk for complications from CMV, and published case reports describe significant morbidity and mortality SLE patients with active CMV infections.. Despite the potential for increased risk of CMV infection while immunosuppressed, no studies to date have examined CMV seropositivity and positive viral load prevalence in SLE patients and it is not the standard of care to test for CMV. Robust exist data from the transplant population, a group exposed to similar immunosuppression but not in SLE.

Methods: We recruited participants from The Ohio State University’s Lupus Clinic who were. >18 years with confirmed SLE diagnosis. We collected demographic information, laboratory data, SLE history, current medications, and serum CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titer. If CMV IgG antibody titer was positive, a CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) viral load was measured.

Results: Baseline characteristics of the 75 SLE patients are summarized in Table 1. Of the enrolled subjects, 66% had a positive CMV IgG titer, but the viral CMV load has been undetectable for all tested participants (Table 2).

Conclusion: Among the 75 SLE patients tested, CMV IgG seropositivity is 66%, which is comparable to the general population. Among the SLE patients with positive CMV IgG antibodies, none had evidence of active CMV infection by CMV viral load, including patients on immunosuppressive medications. These results differ greatly from the similarly immunosuppressed post-transplant population where 20-60% of patients have acquired acute CMV infections defined by positive viral load. These results suggest that CMV status does not need to be routinely checked in the SLE population unless specifically clinically indicated. Table 1: Participant Characteristics

 

% (n)or Mean (n)

Age, mean (no.)

39.5 (75)

African American, % (no.)

38.7 %(75)

Caucasian, % (no.)

57.3% (75)

Female, % (no.)

88.0%(75)

Duration disease (years), mean (no.)

10.1 (75)

SLEDAI, mean (no.),

2.8 (75)

Lupus nephritis, % (no.)

47.4% (75)

WBC (K/uL ), mean (no.)

5.6 (75)

Table 2: Proportion of Participants CMV IgG and Positive CMV PCR Viral Load

 

CMV IgG positive % (no.)

Positive CMV viral load

Total Number patients

66% (60)

0

On cyclophosphamide

100% (2)

0

On mycophenolic acid/ mycophenolate mofetil

55.3% (38)

0


Disclosure: B. LaMoreaux, None; A. Meara, None; H. Steigelman, None; J. Yedimenko, None; W. N. Jarjour, None; S. P. Ardoin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

LaMoreaux B, Meara A, Steigelman H, Yedimenko J, Jarjour WN, Ardoin SP. Prevalence of CMV in the Ohio State University Lupus Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-cmv-in-the-ohio-state-university-lupus-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-cmv-in-the-ohio-state-university-lupus-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology