ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1073

Prescription Medication Trends in Medicaid-Enrolled Pregnant Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Rishi Desai1, Krista Huybrechts2, Brian Bateman2, Helen Mogun2, Sonia Hernandez-diaz3 and Seoyoung C. Kim4, 1PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 4Div. of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Div. of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, pregnancy and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outcomes

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Little is known about the trends of medication use in pregnant women with autoimmune disorders. The objective of the current study was to examine the prevalence and trends of oral steroids and immunomodulatory drug use in pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: A cohort of pregnant women with RA, psoriasis, or SLE was identified using data from the Medicaid Analytical eXtract for the period of 2000-2007. The following 3 classes of medications were identified using prescription dispensing data for these patients; 1) oral steroids, 2) non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs), and 3) biologic DMARDs. The proportion of women with RA, psoriasis, and SLE exposed to these medications in the following time-windows were reported, 1) 3 months pre-last menstrual period (LMP), 2) first trimester, 3) second trimester, and 4) third trimester. Trends in the use were also evaluated by calendar year.

Results: A total of 1,734 pregnant women with RA, 2,932 with psoriasis and 2,392 with SLE enrolled in Medicaid from 46 states and Washington, DC were identified. During the 3 months pre-LMP, 16.8% of women with RA used oral steroids, 11.9% used nbDMARDs, and 4.3% used biologics. During pregnancy, the use of steroids showed modest reduction in women with RA compared to 3 months pre-LMP use (Figure). However, the use of nbDMARDs showed a marked reduction during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters with 7.8%, 2.9%, and 2.6% of women with RA using these agents during these periods, respectively. Similarly, the use of biologics in women with RA also decreased during pregnancy. In women with psoriasis, 6.3% used oral steroids, 0.8% used nbDMARDs, and 1.4% used biologics during the 3 months pre-LMP period. During pregnancy, use decreased for all the three classes of medications. In women with SLE, 16.7% used oral steroids, 14.9% used nbDMARDs, and 0.6% used biologics during the 3 months pre-LMP. Use of steroids was increased moderately during pregnancy compared to 3 months pre-LMP use, but a lower proportion of women used non-biologic and biologics during pregnancy in the SLE cohort. No meaningful time trends were observed in use of these three classes of medications during pregnancy between 2000 and 2007.

Conclusion: We observed reduced use of non-biologic and biologics in women with RA, psoriasis, and SLE during pregnancy compared to before pregnancy. This reduced use may be due to lowered disease activity during pregnancy or fetal safety concerns related to the use of these agents. Oral steroids were the most commonly used therapy in all three populations at all the stages of pregnancy. Given this high use, future research evaluating the safety of steroids in pregnancy is warranted.

 


Figure: Trends in use of oral steroids, non-biologic and biologic DMARDs at different stages of pregnancy in women with RA, psoriasis, and SLE


Disclosure:

R. Desai,

Biogen Idec,

1;

K. Huybrechts,
None;

B. Bateman,
None;

H. Mogun,
None;

S. Hernandez-diaz,

Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca,

5;

S. C. Kim,

Pfizer Inc,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prescription-medication-trends-in-medicaid-enrolled-pregnant-women-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-psoriasis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology