ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1506

Prescribing Patterns in Lupus Nephritis: Analyzing Time from Proteinuria to Prescription of ACE/ARB

JM JANSZ1, WL GALLANTER1, EM Adams2, Nadera Sweiss3 and Huan Chang4, 1University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 4University of Illinois at Chicago; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1488–1512) SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Black patients with lupus nephritis have worse renal outcomes compared with their White counterparts. Currently, there is a paucity of data evaluating the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in lupus patients with proteinuria despite their well-established benefits. The objective of this study was to examine the prescribing patterns of ACE/ARB in lupus patients with laboratory evidence of proteinuria, focusing on demographic factors such as race/ethnicity, gender and age.

Methods: The study population comprised patients seen in an urban academic medical center from January 1, 2000 through September 12, 2020 with at least one ambulatory encounter and a diagnosis code associated with either lupus or lupus nephritis. Proteinuria was defined according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of renal disease, which includes a urine protein 3+ or above (300 mg/dL or greater), a urine protein creatinine ratio > 0.5, a 24-hour urine protein excretion greater than 0.5g, or a urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio greater than 50. The time interval from the first laboratory result indicating proteinuria in patients naive to an ACE/ARB to the day of ACE/ARB prescription was measured in days.

Results: Data show 39% of lupus patients with laboratory evidence of proteinuria were prescribed an ACE/ARB during the study time frame. For those who received a prescription, the median time from the detection of proteinuria to the prescription of an ACE/ARB was 382 days. Non-White patients (Black, Hispanic, and Other) were more frequently prescribed an ACE or an ARB compared with White patients (p=0.005). There was also a trend indicating higher prescription rates for female patients compared with male patients (p=0.06). There was a non-statistically significant reduction in prescription of ACE/ARB in patients greater than 65 years old.

Conclusion: Our study reveals a pattern of incomplete and delayed treatment of proteinuria with an ACE/ARB in lupus patients with evidence of proteinuria. Less than half of lupus patients with proteinuria received an ACE/ARB during the study timeframe, with Non-White patients significantly more likely to receive an ACE/ARB than White patients. The median time to ACE/ARB initiation was greater than a year. We intend to conduct further analysis to investigate hypertension as a potential confounding factor in the earlier initiation of an ACE/ARB among Non-White patients. Additionally, we plan to examine the time elapsed from proteinuria diagnosis to the prescription of immunosuppressive medications. These additional analyses will provide insight into optimizing timely evidence-based management of lupus nephritis patients.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Cohort and Treatment Cohort Demographics

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Percentage of Patients with Proteinuria Prescribed an ACE/ARB Over Time in Days


Disclosures: J. JANSZ: None; W. GALLANTER: None; E. Adams: None; N. Sweiss: None; H. Chang: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

JANSZ J, GALLANTER W, Adams E, Sweiss N, Chang H. Prescribing Patterns in Lupus Nephritis: Analyzing Time from Proteinuria to Prescription of ACE/ARB [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prescribing-patterns-in-lupus-nephritis-analyzing-time-from-proteinuria-to-prescription-of-ace-arb/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prescribing-patterns-in-lupus-nephritis-analyzing-time-from-proteinuria-to-prescription-of-ace-arb/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology