ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2534

Pregnancy Complications In Lupus:  Retrospective Observational Analysis From a US Health Claims Database

Michelle. A. Petri1, Paola Daly2, Daphnee S. Pushparajah3, David Friesen4 and Lydia Makaroff3, 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Lupus Foundation of America, Washington DC, DC, 3UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 4UCB Pharma, Slough, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Data analysis, pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Clinical Aspects III: Biomarkers, Quality of Life and Disease Indicators, Late Complications

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

 

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease most frequently affecting women of childbearing age. Women with SLE are known to be at increased risk of miscarriage and other complications during pregnancy. This study used a large health claims database to quantify the reported incidence of maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with SLE compared to pregnant women without SLE.  

Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of the MarketScan US administrative healthcare claims database from 2006 to 2012 was conducted. Records of all women aged 12-54 years were reviewed. SLE patients were defined by ICD-9 codes for 710.0 on at least 2 different days. Pregnancies were identified by including codes for live birth, miscarriage, and either first-or second trimester ultrasound. Pregnant women with SLE were matched 1:5 by index year and quarter, age, geography, data type, insurance plan type, and employee relationship with pregnant women without SLE.  Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate p values. Statistical tests were not corrected for multiple comparisons. P values are presented in the table.  

Results: 1721 pregnancies in women with SLE were matched with 8605 pregnancies in women without SLE. Demographics were similar; mean (± SD) age of 31.5 (± 5.6) in the SLE group and 31.4 in (± 5.6) in controls. 23 in every 100 SLE pregnancies resulted in a miscarriage before 22 weeks gestation vs. 19 in every 100 control pregnancies. There was an increased risk of threatened abortion/premature labour without delivery in pregnancies with SLE vs. those without (46.0% vs. 39.8%). Hypertension was reported in 28.4% of SLE pregnancies vs. 12.4% of controls. Preeclampsia occurred in 1 in every 10 SLE pregnancies vs. 1 in every 22 non SLE pregnancies. Preterm delivery occurred in 1 in every 9 SLE pregnancies vs. 1 in every 17  non SLE pregnancies, with stillbirths reported in 2.4% of SLE pregnancies vs. 1.3% of subjects without SLE. There was a 7.5% increase in the risk of fetal complications in pregnancies with SLE vs. those without. A code for known/suspected fetal abnormality affecting management of the mother occurred in 39.7% of SLE pregnancies vs. 28.0% of controls.

Conclusion:

In this large database analysis of over 10,000 pregnant women, those with SLE had a higher risk for suspected fetal abnormalities affecting care of the mother, and a doubling of risk for hypertension, preeclampsia, pre-term delivery and stillbirths. However, increased risk for earlier adverse pregnancy events, including miscarriage prior to 22 weeks and threatened abortion, appeared modest.  These data highlight the need for regular physician-patient interaction, counseling and high quality education for women with SLE who are pregnant or looking to conceive to ensure possible complications are recognized early and managed appropriately.

   


Disclosure:

M. A. Petri,

UCB Pharma,

2,

UCB Pharma,

5;

P. Daly,
None;

D. S. Pushparajah,

UCB Pharma,

3;

D. Friesen,

UCB Pharma,

3;

L. Makaroff,

UCB Pharma,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pregnancy-complications-in-lupus-retrospective-observational-analysis-from-a-us-health-claims-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology