ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3131

Pregabalin Is More Effective in Treating Hand Osteoarthritis Pain Than Duloxetine or Placebo: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Nidhi Sofat1, Abiola Harrison2, Salma Ayis3, Patrick Kiely4, Thomas Richard Barrick5 and Franklyn Howe6, 1Basic Medical Sciences, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Mailpoint J1A, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 3Department if Statistics, Division of Health & Social Care Research, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Rheumatology Dept, St Georges Hospital, London, Great Britain, 5Clinical Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 6Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: clinical trials, Hand disorders, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspect II: Treatment and Imaging

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Pain is a major symptom in hand osteoarthritis (OA), with many patients taking analgesics including acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and even opioids. Patients with OA who do not respond to conventional analgesics may have ‘sensitization’, or heightened pain symptoms which are centrally mediated. We hypothesized that patients with hand OA who have features of sensitization may improve with centrally-acting analgesics including duloxetine or pregabalin.

Methods:   A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from 42 primary care and rheumatology clinics in the UK. We recruited 85 participants: 65 with hand OA confirmed by ACR criteria (mean age 62 years) and 20 age-matched non-OA controls. Patients were assigned 1:1:1 to treatment with duloxetine (up to 60 mg), pregabalin (up to 300 mg) or matched placebo. The primary endpoints were the Australian and Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) pain score change and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain rating 0-10 from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. Secondary endpoints were AUSCAN function, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) for sensitization measured by algometry (Wagner).

Results:   All participants were randomised and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The highest mean reduction in AUSCAN pain scores was achieved for the pregabalin group (mean change -132.1, 95% confidence interval -181.1 to -82.9) followed by duloxetine (mean change -62.5, 95% confidence interval -141.6 to 16.6) and placebo (mean change -47.1, 95% confidence interval -93.9 to 11.7). The most significant improvement after treatment was in the pregabalin group compared with placebo (p=0.013), Figure 1. AUSCAN pain reduction for duloxetine was not significant (p=0.90). VAS pain outcome was significant for pregabalin (p<0.00001) and duloxetine (p=0.029) respectively with no change in depression or anxiety scores in any group. PPT were lower in hand OA than non-OA controls at baseline (p<0.05). Side effects were similar in pregabalin and duloxetine groups, although more neurological side effects occurred in the pregabalin group including dizziness, dry mouth, sleepiness and loss of balance. PPT were useful for screening for sensitization, but did not change significantly after treatment (p>0.05).

Conclusion:   Pregabalin has significant efficacy at 300 mg in improving pain and function after 12 weeks compared with duloxetine or placebo in hand OA. VAS pain outcomes for pregabalin and duloxetine both showed significant efficacy over placebo. PPTs are useful for screening for sensitization and identifying participants who are likely to respond to centrally-acting analgesics. Our results demonstrate evidence for pregabalin as an alternative for OA pain in sensitized patients and clinical trials that examine the balance between efficacy and side effects should be encouraged.


Disclosure: N. Sofat, None; A. Harrison, None; S. Ayis, None; P. Kiely, None; T. R. Barrick, None; F. Howe, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sofat N, Harrison A, Ayis S, Kiely P, Barrick TR, Howe F. Pregabalin Is More Effective in Treating Hand Osteoarthritis Pain Than Duloxetine or Placebo: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pregabalin-is-more-effective-in-treating-hand-osteoarthritis-pain-than-duloxetine-or-placebo-a-double-blind-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pregabalin-is-more-effective-in-treating-hand-osteoarthritis-pain-than-duloxetine-or-placebo-a-double-blind-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology