ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1383

Prediction of Digital Ulcers in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Based on the Use of Platelet Inhibitors and Other Parameters – A EUSTAR Study on Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model

Alexandru Garaiman1, Klaus Steigmiller2, Catherine Gebhard3, Marco Matucci-Cerinic4, Jorg Henes5, Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra6, Vanessa Smith7, Andrea Doria8, Yannick Allanore9, Lorenzo Dagna10, Branimir Anic11, Carlomaurizio Montecucco12, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka13, Mickael Martin14, Yoshiya Tanaka15, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold16, Ulrike Held2, Oliver Distler17 and Mike Oliver Becker18, 1University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 4University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 5University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 6Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 7Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, 8University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 9Université de Paris, Paris, France, 1010Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy, 11Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb and University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia, 12Department of Rheumatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, 13Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland, 14Internal Medicine, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France, 15University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 16Department of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 17Center of Experimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 18Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II (1364–1390)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Digital ulcers (DUs) affect half of the patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and can be complicated by gangrene and amputation. Platelets are known to be activated in SSc, therefore, platelet inhibitors might represent a therapeutic option in the management of DUs. However, until now, there is no clinical study to assess the importance of platelet inhibitors in the occurrence of DUs in patients with SSc. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a prediction model for the occurrence of DUs in patients with SSc based on platelet inhibitors and other parameters.

Methods: This study used prospectively collected data from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) registry. Patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria with complete longitudinal data on the presence of DUs and platelet inhibitors were included in the analysis. Multiple imputation using a random forest algorithm was implemented to handle missing values.

The dataset, containing the information of the last follow-up visit of every patient, was split into a derivation cohort (patients recorded before 2017-01-01 in the EUSTAR registry) and validation cohort (patients recorded after 2017-01-01). To investigate the response for the binary dependent variable of DUs, binary logistic regression was implemented to develop a prediction in the derivation cohort and to validate it using ROC analysis and calibration plots to address discrimination and calibration, respectively.

Results: Of 3,710 patients (14.6% males, 67.8% limited cutaneous SSc, median age 56.97 years, median disease duration 8.94 years), 486 had current DUs at the baseline and 150 were exposed to platelet inhibitors. At the follow-up visit (median follow-up time 1.03 years) 487 had current DUs and 90 remained exposed to platelet inhibitors.

Factors associated with absence or presence of DUs at the next follow-up visit are shown in figure 1. This confirmed the risk factors for the presence of DUs identified by previous studies.

The discrimination ability of the model evaluated by ROC curve analysis showed an AUC = 80.8% (95% CI = [78.7% to 83.0%]) for the derivation cohort (2,827 patients) and AUC = 83.4% (95% CI = [80.0% to 86.8%]) for the validation cohort (883 patients), respectively, corresponding to an acceptable discrimination (figure 2). The calibration plots revealed an adequate calibration of the model (figure 3).

Amongst other predictive factors, our model revealed that exposure to platelet inhibitors is associated with a reduced odds ratio of DUs occurrence at the next follow up visit (OR = 0.25, 95%CI [0.07-0.77]).

Conclusion: Our model shows good discrimination and adequate calibration for the difficult task of predicting the occurrence of DUs at a one-year follow up visit. Use of platelet inhibitors was among the factors predicting lower probability of DUs occurrence at follow-up.

FIgure 1: Forest plot displaying the OR of the logistic classification model

Figure 2: ROC curves displaying the discrimination ability of the fitted model in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively

Figure 3: Calibration plots for the logistic classification model – the figure shows the calibration plot of the model in the derivation cohort (left side) and in the validation cohort (right). On the X‐axis, the model’s predicted probability of the occurrence of DUs is plotted against the observed risk of presence of DUs on the Y‐axis (0 = absence of DUs, 1 = presence of DUs). The red line represents perfect prediction, meaning that the predicted risk is exactly the same as the observed risk across the whole range. Ideally, the lines obtained should lie exactly on top of the red line.


Disclosures: A. Garaiman, None; K. Steigmiller, None; C. Gebhard, None; M. Matucci-Cerinic, Merck, 5, 6, Actelion, 5, 6, Janssen, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 6, Biogen, 6; J. Henes, Roche Pharma, 1, 5, 6, ABBVIE, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, SOBI, 5, 6, LILLY, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, BMS, 6, Janssen, 6, UCB, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 6; J. de Vries-Bouwstra, None; V. Smith, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 6, Janssens, 2, 6; A. Doria, GSK, 2, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 6, Janssen, 6, Roche, 6; Y. Allanore, None; L. Dagna, None; B. Anic, None; C. Montecucco, None; O. Kowal-Bielecka, None; M. Martin, None; Y. Tanaka, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Novartis, 6, YL Biologics, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Eisai, 5, 6, Chugai, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Astellas, 6, Pfizer, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, Asahi-kasei, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 6, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 5, 6, Gilead, 6, Janssen, 6, Takeda, 5, Ayumi, 2, Taisho, 2; A. Hoffmann-Vold, None; U. Held, None; O. Distler, AbbVie, 12, Project scoring fee for Rheumatology Grant, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer Inc, 2; M. Becker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garaiman A, Steigmiller K, Gebhard C, Matucci-Cerinic M, Henes J, de Vries-Bouwstra J, Smith V, Doria A, Allanore Y, Dagna L, Anic B, Montecucco C, Kowal-Bielecka O, Martin M, Tanaka Y, Hoffmann-Vold A, Held U, Distler O, Becker M. Prediction of Digital Ulcers in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Based on the Use of Platelet Inhibitors and Other Parameters – A EUSTAR Study on Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prediction-of-digital-ulcers-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-based-on-the-use-of-platelet-inhibitors-and-other-parameters-a-eustar-study-on-derivation-and-validation-of-a-clinical-prediction-mod/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prediction-of-digital-ulcers-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-based-on-the-use-of-platelet-inhibitors-and-other-parameters-a-eustar-study-on-derivation-and-validation-of-a-clinical-prediction-mod/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology