ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2511

Potential Barriers That Limit Access to Rheumatologists Among Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Universal Access Health Care System

Jessica Widdifield1, J. Michael Paterson2, Sasha Bernatsky3, Karen Tu2, Nadia Gunraj2, Noah Ivers1, Debra Butt2, R. Liisa Jaakkimainen4, J. Carter Thorne5, Vandana Ahluwalia6 and Claire Bombardier7, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Ctre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Preventive Med and Biostatisti, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 6William Osler Health Center, Brampton, ON, Canada, 7Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Access to care, health disparities, quality of care and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Epidemiology Abstract Session

Session Type: Combined Abstract Sessions

Background/Purpose:

Current guidelines for the optimal care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend prompt referral to a rheumatologist. In the province of Ontario, Canada all 13 million residents are covered by universal public health insurance. However, almost 2 million residents do no have a regular family physician. Previous research has shown that sustained continuity of primary care plays a positive role in patient health outcomes for other chronic diseases. However, the impact of sustained continuity of primary care on access to rheumatologists remains unstudied. This is particularly concerning since family physicians function as gatekeepers for access to rheumatologists. Our objective was to estimate the percent of incident RA patients who see a rheumatologist within 1 year of diagnosis, and to identify determinants of contact with a rheumatologist within 1 year of RA diagnosis. 

Methods:

We assembled an incident RA cohort aged >65 years from Ontario health administrative data across 1997-2008.  We used a validated algorithm to identify 27,127 seniors with early RA. We followed patients for 1 year, assessing if they had a visit to a rheumatologist. We assessed secular trends and differences for patients who saw a rheumatologist versus those who had not. We performed multilevel logistic regression analyses to determine whether receipt of rheumatology care was associated with: patient characteristics, primary care physician characteristics and provider continuity, and geographic characteristics.

Results:

Overall, 17830 (66%) seniors with early RA identified over 1997-2008 saw a rheumatologist within 1 year of diagnosis. This increased from 50% in 1997 to 78% in 2008. The majority of patients (67%) were female. Few patients (16%) resided in rural areas. Factors associated with a rheumatologist encounter included increasing continuity of primary care, [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)=1.30 95% CI 1.11, 1.53], patients of highest socioeconomic status (SES) [aOR=1.24 95% CI 1.13-1.36], and having more rheumatologists in the area (Rheumatology supply per 100,000 adults aOR=1.20 95% CI 1.16, 1.24).  Less contact with rheumatologists occurred among patients with increasing age (aOR= 0.97 95% CI 0.97, 0.98), patients who had male primary care physicians (aOR=0.73 95% CI 0.66, 0.80), residing in a rural area (aOR=0.74 95% CI  0.68, 0.81) and at a remote distance (≥100 km) to the closest rheumatologist (aOR=0.37 95% CI  0.31, 0.44).

Conclusion:

Improvements in access to rheumatologists for RA care have occurred over time but more efforts are needed.  Potential barriers that limit timely access to rheumatologists include increasing age, lower SES, and having a male primary care physician. Measures of poor access (poor continuity of primary care, density and proximity to rheumatologists) negatively impacted rates of encounters with a rheumatologist. Proactive, tailored approaches are needed to provide rheumatology care to such populations. 


Disclosure:

J. Widdifield,
None;

J. M. Paterson,
None;

S. Bernatsky,
None;

K. Tu,
None;

N. Gunraj,
None;

N. Ivers,
None;

D. Butt,
None;

R. L. Jaakkimainen,
None;

J. C. Thorne,
None;

V. Ahluwalia,
None;

C. Bombardier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/potential-barriers-that-limit-access-to-rheumatologists-among-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-a-universal-access-health-care-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology