ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1343

Pop a Pill or Give Myself a Shot? Patient Perspectives of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Choice for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Jasvinder Singh1, Haley Tornberg 2 and Susan Goodman 3, 1University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Hospital For Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic drugs and patient preferences, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, qualitative, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Treatments, Outcomes, & Measures

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Little is known about the patient perspective related to DMARD choice in RA. Our objective was to assess how patients decide whether to add traditional oral DMARDs or injectable biologic DMARDs to methotrexate for the treatment of active RA.

Methods: We conducted 10 nominal groups in patients with RA from rheumatology clinics at two tertiary care centers at Birmingham (n=6; 21 patients) and New York City (n=4; 26 patients).  Patients provided responses to the question “What sort of things are important to you when you make a decision between adding pills versus injectable medications to treat rheumatoid arthritis when methotrexate fails to control RA disease activity?” Patients nominated, discussed and voted for the responses.

Results: Forty-seven patients participated in 10 nominal groups, who were predominantly female (85%), 70% white, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.5 years and 58% with >10 year RA duration. Present/past DMARDs included methotrexate in 91% and biologics and/or Jak-inhibitors in 68% of participants. The mean MD-HAQ score was 2 on a 0-10 scale and the mean RAPID-3 score on a 0-30 scale was 9.1. The main responses ranked by patients were as follows.

Efficacy/mode of action was among the voted domains in 10/10 nominal groups and got 28% of the votes (78/282 votes; Figure 1).  Side effects/fear of side effects was among the voted domains in 9/10 nominal groups and got 30% of the votes (84/282 votes).  Cost was among the voted domains in 9/10 nominal groups and got 19% of the votes (54/282 votes). Out of pocket costs, including co-payments and patient responsibility for the drug cost was the most important aspect of the medication cost that impacted the choice.  Convenience/frequency of use was among the voted domains in 9/10 nominal groups and got 10% of the votes (27/282 votes).  Doctor’s opinion was among the voted domains in 4/10 nominal groups and got 7% of the votes (20/282 votes). Patients greatly valued their rheumatologist’s opinion, which was either a strong factor or a deciding factor for them. Other drugs/comorbidity/other patient’s experience/effects on other people was among the voted domains in 3/10 nominal groups and got 1% of the votes (3/282 votes). Many patients worried about drug-drug interactions and contra-indications in the presence of other systemic conditions. Fear of Needles was among the voted domains in 1/10 nominal groups and got 3% of the votes (8/282 votes). People expressed “Fear of injections” “Anxiety about self-injecting”, and “Nauseating concept if you are not a medical person”.  The newness of the medication was among the voted domains in 1/10 nominal groups and got 3% of the votes (8/282 votes).

Conclusion: Our qualitative study identified the patient perspective of DMARD choice between oral versus injectable drugs once methotrexate fails to control disease activity. This knowledge can help in informative shared decision-making in regular clinical care.


Figures_RA_meds_NGT_abstract

Figure 1. Domains associated with choice of oral triple therapy vs. adding injectable biologics -n=47-, shown as total votes by each NGT -A- and the number of votes in each NGT -B-

Figure legend:
We show each domain in the figure panels and either the total votes across all NGTs showing the split by each NGT -A-, with x-axis showing the total number of votes or the number of votes within each NGT -B-, with y-axis showing the number of votes within each NGT


Disclosure: J. Singh, Amarin pharmaceuticals, 1, 4, Clearview healthcae partners, 5, Clearview healthcare partners, 5, Clinical Care options, 5, Horizon, 5, Medisys, 5, OMERACT, 6, Putnam associates, 5, Spherix, 5, the American College of Rheumatology, 5, The American College of Rheumatology, 5, The National Institues of Health, 5, the National Institutes of Health, 5, Viking therapeutics, 1, 4, WebMD, 5; H. Tornberg, None; S. Goodman, BMC Rheumatology, 5, 6, Calgene, 5, Celgene, 5, Current Rheumatology reports, 5, Current Rheumatology Reports, 6, Horizon, 2, 5, horizon, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, NYU College of Medicine, 3, NYU Langone College of Medicine, 3, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regenosine, 4, 9, Roche, 2, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh J, Tornberg H, Goodman S. Pop a Pill or Give Myself a Shot? Patient Perspectives of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Choice for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pop-a-pill-or-give-myself-a-shot-patient-perspectives-of-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drug-dmard-choice-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pop-a-pill-or-give-myself-a-shot-patient-perspectives-of-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drug-dmard-choice-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology