ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1445

Physicians’ Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis

Yongdong Zhao1, Fatma Dedeoglu2, Polly J. Ferguson3, Sivia Lapidus4, Ronald Laxer5, Suzanne C. Li6 and for the CARRA SVRD subcommittee, 1Pediatric Rheumatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, 2Rheumatology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Dept of Pediatrics--Rheum, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 4Pediatric Rheumatology, Goryeb Children's Hospital, Morristown, NJ, 5Division of Rheumatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Pediatrics, Joseph M Sanzari Children’s Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), diagnosis and treatment, Imaging, MRI

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology - Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Posters. Juvenile Arthritis and Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO), also known as chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), is an autoinflammatory bone disease of unknown cause that can result in persistent bone pain, destruction and pathological fractures. Currently, no guidelines exist in managing patients with CNO. Understanding the practices of pediatric rheumatologists in diagnosing and treating CNO would provide us with important information to refine the diagnostic criteria and guide the development of consensus treatment plans. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) which disease features physicians consider important for ordering a bone biopsy, (2) physicians’ approaches in monitoring disease activity and (3) physicians’ treatment choices.

Methods: After IRB approval, we surveyed members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) using a web-based questionnaire regarding diagnosis and management of CNO. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: 135 of 369 (38%) members responded to the survey and 124 completed the survey. Thirteen chose an early survey exit point because of lack of experience in managing CNO. 84.2% of responders were pediatric rheumatology attending physicians with 50% of responders having practiced >10 years, and 13.4 % were fellows. The majority of these providers cared for 1-4 patients (70.5%) and diagnosed 0-3 new cases (90.2%) each year. Most providers felt “very or moderately” confident with diagnosing (81.8%) and treating (86.6%) patients with CNO.

Reported bone biopsy frequencies were: never 0%, rarely 11.6%, sometimes 25.6%, often 39.7%, or always 23.1%. The top three reasons for performing a biopsy were constitutional findings (84.8%), unifocal bone lesions (82.6%), and nocturnal bone pain (57.6%). The top three reasons for not performing a biopsy were involvement of typical sites such as the metaphyses of long bones and clavicles (83.5%), presence of multiple bone lesions (79.1%), and presence of conditions known to be associated with CNO, such as psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (63.7%). Biopsy sites were usually determined by the orthopedic surgeon or interventional radiologists (67.5%).

Among all imaging modalities, regional MRI and X rays were most commonly used. 36.5% of responders used whole body MRI often or always. 53.3% of responders used imaging regularly to monitor disease activity, 53.1% of which monitored every 6 months and 25% of which obtained imaging every 12 months.

Almost all responders (98.3) routinely prescribed NSAIDs as initial therapy. For patients who failed NSAID treatment, methotrexate (68.6%), TNF inhibitors (66.9%) and bisphosphonates (46.6%) were the next most commonly used treatments. Presence of a spinal lesion increased the use of bisphosphonate treatment.

Conclusion: The diagnostic approach and disease activity monitoring for CNO varied among physicians. NSAIDs remained the first line treatment for CNO. Methotrexate, TNF inhibitors and bisphosphonates were most commonly used after NSAIDs failed. These findings provide important background to move forward with development of consensus treatment plans for CNO.

Funded by NIAMS, Friends of CARRA and the Arthritis Foundation.


Disclosure: Y. Zhao, None; F. Dedeoglu, None; P. J. Ferguson, None; S. Lapidus, None; R. Laxer, None; S. C. Li, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhao Y, Dedeoglu F, Ferguson PJ, Lapidus S, Laxer R, Li SC. Physicians’ Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/physicians-perspectives-on-the-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/physicians-perspectives-on-the-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology