ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0683

Pharmacokinetics of Pegloticase and Methotrexate Polyglutamate(s) in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Pegloticase and Co-treatment of Methotrexate

Yang Song1, Yan Xin1, Michael Weinblatt2, Jason Chamberlain1, Katie Obermeyer3, Lin Zhao3, Colleen Canavan3, Paul Peloso4 and Srini Ramanathan1, 1Horizon Therapeutics plc, South San Francisco, CA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Horizon Therapeutics plc, Lake Forest, IL, 4Horizon Therapeutics plc, Gurnee, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In an open-label trial in adult patients with uncontrolled gout (MIRROR open-label [OL] trial) evaluating pegloticase co-treatment with methotrexate (MTX), 78.6% patients maintained serum uric acid < 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during month 6 [weeks 20, 22, and 24] versus 42% in pegloticase historical monotherapy trials (C0405 and C0406)1. MTX co-treatment can affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of biologics by attenuating the formation of anti-drug antibodies2. The aim of this analysis was to determine the systemic exposures of pegloticase and methotrexate polyglutamate(s) (MTX-PGs) in uncontrolled gout patients receiving pegloticase and MTX and to evaluate the effect of MTX on the PK and immunogenicity of pegloticase in comparison to historical pegloticase monotherapy trials (C0405 and C0406)3,4.

Methods: In the MIRROR OL trial, MTX (15 mg/week) was given orally 4 weeks prior to the 1st pegloticase dose and continued weekly, in combination with pegloticase 8 mg given intravenously every 2 weeks, for a treatment duration of 52 weeks. Pre-infusion samples were collected to measure MTX-PGs in red blood cells. Pre- and post-infusion blood samples were obtained to measure the peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of pegloticase at multiple visits. Anti-drug antibody blood samples were collected at multiple visits. The impact of MTX on pegloticase PK was evaluated by comparing pegloticase exposures with MTX from this trial to historical monotherapy data (C0405 and C0406)3,4. The observed pegloticase concentrations with MTX were also overlaid with the 90% prediction interval based on the population PK model from C0405 and C04065.

Results: Pegloticase and MTX-PG levels were determined in fourteen patients. Responders (11/14) were generally associated with higher pegloticase exposures, especially Cmin (Figure 1). Concomitant treatment of MTX resulted in fewer patients with Cmin below quantitation limit (BQL) (5/14 [36%] with MTX vs 63/82 [77%] without MTX), and higher overall Cmin (median: 0.97 µg/ml with MTX vs BQL without MTX); Cmax was slightly higher (median [Q1, Q3]: 2.04 [1.65, 2.68] µg/mL with MTX vs 1.51 [BQL, 2.48] µg/mL without MTX). Pegloticase co-treatment with MTX resulted in more concentrations above the predicted median value of pegloticase, compared to monotherapy (Figure 1,2). This may be due to the effect of MTX in reducing the immunogenicity of pegloticase. Concentrations of MTX-PGs were maintained during the treatment course, suggesting compliance of MTX administration. There was no apparent relationship between response and MTX-PGs exposures.

Conclusion: Pegloticase 8 mg IV every 2 weeks co-treatment with MTX 15 mg weekly resulted in fewer patients with pegloticase Cmin BQL, and higher overall Cmin compared to pegloticase monotherapy and was associated with an improved response rate for pegloticase in patients with uncontrolled gout.

References:

1. Botson J., et al. Ann Rheum Dis; 2020, 79(S1).
2. Goss S. L., et al. Clin Ther; 2018, 40(2).
3. Lipsky P. E., et al. Arthritis Res Ther; 2014, 16(2).
4. Sundy J. S., et al. JAMA; 2011, 306(7).
5. Yue C. S., et al. ASCPT, Atlanta, 2010.

Figure 1. Comparison of pegloticase exposures (Cmax and Cmin) in methotrexate co-treatment (MIRROR OL) and monotherapy trials (C0405 and C0406)

Figure 2. Comparison of observed pegloticase concentrations in MIRROR OL and stimulated PK profile of pegloticase as monotherapy


Disclosure: Y. Song, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; Y. Xin, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; M. Weinblatt, Crescendo Bioscience, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, Sanofi, 2, Lilly, 1, Amgen, 1, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Arena, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Canfite, 1, 5, Corrona, 5, Crescendo, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Gilead, 9, Horizon, 9, Johnson and Johnson, 9, Lilly, 2, 9, Pfizer, 9, Scipher, 1, 9, Set Point, 9, Roche, 9, Canfite, 1, Inmedix, 1, Lycera, 1, Vorso, 1, Scipher, 1; J. Chamberlain, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; K. Obermeyer, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; L. Zhao, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; C. Canavan, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3; P. Peloso, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2; S. Ramanathan, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Song Y, Xin Y, Weinblatt M, Chamberlain J, Obermeyer K, Zhao L, Canavan C, Peloso P, Ramanathan S. Pharmacokinetics of Pegloticase and Methotrexate Polyglutamate(s) in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Pegloticase and Co-treatment of Methotrexate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacokinetics-of-pegloticase-and-methotrexate-polyglutamates-in-patients-with-uncontrolled-gout-receiving-pegloticase-and-co-treatment-of-methotrexate/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacokinetics-of-pegloticase-and-methotrexate-polyglutamates-in-patients-with-uncontrolled-gout-receiving-pegloticase-and-co-treatment-of-methotrexate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology