ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 1728

Pharmacokinetics of Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma Treated By Cyclophosphamide Versus Transplantation

David Adams1, Keith Sullivan2, Ivan Spasojevic1, Ping Fan1, Mario Sampson3, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez3, E. William St Clair4, Rob Woolson5, Jan Storek6, Mary Ellen Csuka7, Ashley Pinckney5, Beverly Welch8, Ellen Goldmuntz9, Daniel E. Furst10, Leslie Crofford11, Lynette Keyes-Elstein12, Maureen Mayes13, Peter McSweeney14 and Richard Nash14, 1Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 2Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 3Pediatrics-Infectious Disease, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 4Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 5Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, 6University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 8National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 9NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 10University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 11Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 12Clinical Statistics, Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, 13Rheumatology, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, 14Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cyclophosphamide, pharmacokinetics, scleroderma and transplantation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Session Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of cyclophosphamide (CP) and its primary active metabolite, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4-OH-CP) have not been adequately studied in scleroderma. The hypothesis of this sub-study of the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation (SCOT) trial (Sullivan, KM et al., N Engl J Med 2018;378:35-47) was that response to CP, defined as event-free survival (EFS) at 54 months, will correlate with exposure (CxT) to the active metabolite 4-OH-CP. Secondary objectives were to determine whether the initial CP exposure enhances activation of a second dose (auto-activation) and to evaluate the effect of CP on myelosuppression.

Methods:

CP was infused over 1 to 2 hours in both study arms. Subjects in the transplant arm received a conditioning regimen of 120 mg/kg (mean 2099 mg/m2). Subjects in the CP arm received an initial infusion of 500 mg/m2, then twelve doses of 750 mg/m2; PK analyses were only done after the first two doses . For transplant, 3 ml blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 23 hours after infusion. For the CP arm, samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, and 24 hours. All samples were immediately derivatized with O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl) hydroxylamine and the 4-OH-CP oxime product analyzed by gas or liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Separate blood draws (5 ml) were collected at ~24 and 48 hours following CP infusion in the transplant arm to determine white blood cell count (wbc). The single-dose PK parameters for CP and 4-OH-CP were computed from the drug C-T data using non-compartmental methods within WinNonLin Phoenix Version 6.2. Metabolic ratio was computed as the ratio of the AUC over 24h for 4-OH-CP to that for CP.

Results:

Of the 12 subjects in the transplant arm and 9 in the CP arm, 75-89% were Caucasian women of median age 44 and 49, respectively. While the metabolic ratio varied 14-fold (0.6 – 8.3), the CxT profiles for both treatment arms were similar with a single elimination phase for both CP and 4-OH-CP. In the CP arm, CxT profiles for both parent drug and active metabolite were very similar in both cycles 1 and 2. When normalized for dose, the median AUC for 4-OH-CP in cycles 1 and 2 were 173 and 171 µg-h/ml, hence there was no auto-activation. There was a significant Pearson product-moment correlation between decrease in wbc and metabolic ratio at 48 h (p = 0.026) in the transplant arm. Odds ratios via logistic regression among PK parameters and EFS were not statistically significant.

Odds Ratios – Likelihood of not meeting Event-Free Survival Endpoint1

Arm

Parameter

Odds Ratio

Lower 95% CI

Upper 95% CI

P value

Cyclophosphamide

CP AUC242

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.94

Cyclophosphamide

CP Cmax

1.1

0.8

1.7

0.51

Cyclophosphamide

Metabolic Ratio3

0.9

0.3

2.1

0.74

Cyclophosphamide

4-OH-PC AUC24

1.1

0.7

1.8

0.70

Cyclophosphamide

4-OH-CP Cmax

3.3

0.1

126.3

0.53

Transplant

CP AUC24

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.20

Transplant

CP Cmax

0.8

0.5

1.1

0.15

Transplant

Metabolic Ratio

1.8

0.5

6.7

0.36

Transplant

4-OH-CP AUC24

1.0

0.7

1.6

0.89

Transplant

4-OH-CP Cmax

1.2

0.1

12.5

0.91

1Event-free survival is survival without respiratory, renal or cardiac failure as defined in Sullivan, KM et al., N Engl J Med 2018;378:35-47.

2AUC24, area under the concentration-time curve at 24 hrs.

3Ratio of AUC24 for 4-OH-CP to that for CP.

Conclusion:

This pilot study, the first of its kind, revealed variable metabolism of CP in scleroderma subjects and drug-induced myelosuppression in the transplant setting. However, in this small cohort of patients, CP exposure did not correlate with EFS in either treatment arm.


Disclosure: D. Adams, None; K. Sullivan, None; I. Spasojevic, None; P. Fan, None; M. Sampson, None; M. Cohen-Wolkowiez, None; E. W. St Clair, None; R. Woolson, None; J. Storek, None; M. E. Csuka, None; A. Pinckney, None; B. Welch, None; E. Goldmuntz, None; D. E. Furst, no stocks, 2, 5, 6, 7; L. Crofford, None; L. Keyes-Elstein, None; M. Mayes, None; P. McSweeney, None; R. Nash, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Adams D, Sullivan K, Spasojevic I, Fan P, Sampson M, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, St Clair EW, Woolson R, Storek J, Csuka ME, Pinckney A, Welch B, Goldmuntz E, Furst DE, Crofford L, Keyes-Elstein L, Mayes M, McSweeney P, Nash R. Pharmacokinetics of Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma Treated By Cyclophosphamide Versus Transplantation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacokinetics-of-cyclophosphamide-in-scleroderma-treated-by-cyclophosphamide-versus-transplantation/. Accessed March 23, 2023.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacokinetics-of-cyclophosphamide-in-scleroderma-treated-by-cyclophosphamide-versus-transplantation/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

ACR Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium 2020

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences