ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2551

Pharmacodynamics and Predictive Biomarkers In Patients Treated With Atacicept: Data From The APRIL-SLE Trial

David A. Isenberg1, David Wofsy2, Yong Li3, Daiana Licu4, Stephen D. Wax5, Caroline Gordon6 and Claudia Pena Rossi4, 1Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Building, 4th Floor, Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology/Immunology, University of California San Francisco and NIAID Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence, San Francisco, CA, 3EMD Serono, Rockland, MA, 4Merck Serono S.A., Geneva, Switzerland, 5Global Clinical Development Center - Immunology, EMD Serono Inc, Rockland, MA, 6Rheumatology Research Group (East Wing), School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: APRIL, biomarkers and treatment, BLyS, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Clinical Aspects III: Biomarkers, Quality of Life and Disease Indicators, Late Complications

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Atacicept is a fusion protein that inhibits B cell stimulating factors BLyS and APRIL. We examined the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of atacicept in patients with SLE. We also investigated whether PD markers have the potential to function as predictors of flare and clinical response to atacicept.

Methods:

APRIL-SLE was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects with active SLE that had become inactive during a 12-week course of tapered corticosteroids. Subjects were then randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo or atacicept 75 or 150 mg twice weekly for 4 weeks, then weekly for 48 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the percent of subjects experiencing an SLE flare (BILAG A and/or B) during a 52-week treatment period. Patients also were followed during a 24-week follow-up period. PD analyses were conducted on the treatment completer population. Analyses of BLyS and APRIL levels as potential predictive biomarkers were performed on the potential completer population. Efficacy and safety results are reported separately.

Results:

Atacicept induced substantial changes in PD and disease-related markers, including reductions in Ig levels, autoantibody levels, and both naïve and memory B cells, as well as increases in complement levels (Table). Except for memory B cells, which continued to decline, these effects lessened during the follow-up period but did not fully return to baseline over 24 weeks. The atacicept treatment effect (reduction in flares vs placebo) was observed in subjects with BLyS or APRIL levels ≥median, but not subjects with levels < median (except in the atacicept 150 mg arm). The difference was most pronounced in patients with both baseline BLyS and APRIL ≥median, with flare rates of 76, 53 and 23% in the placebo, 75 mg, and 150 mg groups, respectively. Atacicept-treated patients with the greatest absolute decrease in IgG experienced the fewest new flares (37.2% for patients in the bottom tertile [<–4 g/L] vs 61.5% for the upper tertile [≥–1.5 g/L]). This pattern was also observed for changes in IgM (47.5 vs 60.0%) and for naïve B cells (38.2 vs 57.1%). The incidence of infection was comparable regardless of BLyS or APRIL level at baseline, or the degree of decline in IgG or IgM levels.

Conclusion:

Atacicept caused declines in IgG, IgA and IgM, as well as naïve and memory B cells. With the exception of memory B cells, these levels returned towards baseline after therapy. Atacicept also had favorable effects on anti-dsDNA and complement levels. The exploratory post-hoc analysis of potential predictive biomarkers identified a subgroup of patients with higher BLyS and APRIL levels at baseline who were more likely to benefit from treatment. In addition, patients with the largest decrease in Ig levels and/or naïve B cells demonstrated a greater clinical response. Further studies are required to clarify the associations between biomarkers and clinical response to atacicept.

Table. Median percent change from baseline; Treatment Completer population

 

Placebo

(n=111)

Atacicept 75 mg (n=112)

Atacicept 150 mg (n=62)

Wk 52

24-wk FU

Wk 52

24-wk FU

Wk 52

24-wk FU

Total IgG

3.23

3.51

–30.40

–7.01

–37.62

–9.24

Total IgA

2.12

1.16

–52.61

–16.22

–57.89

–21.96

Total IgM

–1.44

–3.13

–65.74

–29.27

–68.75

–24.04

Naïve B cells*

–9.00

–5.63

–80.12

–66.67

–81.47

–66.67

Memory B cells*

–2.17

9.30

–12.50

–50.00

–28.21

–40.00

Plasma cells*

0.00

–34.85

–61.58

–55.00

–67.08

0.00

 

Wk 52

12-wk FU

Wk 52

12-wk FU

Wk 52

12-wk FU

Anti-dsDNA (subjects +ve at screening)†

13.89

41.42

–31.46

–20.85

–37.86

­–11.78

C3 (subj ‡

4.13

3.56

7.15

3.01

15.38

5.43

C4 (subj §

–0.44

0.00

42.71

18.18

49.50

48.94

*Flow cytometry population: placebo, n=37; atacicept 75 mg, n=38; atacicept 150 mg, n=25; †Anti-dsDNA >=30 IU/ml; placebo, n=71; atacicept 75 mg, n=62; atacicept 150 mg, n=43; ‡C3 <0.9 g/L; placebo, n=33; atacicept 75 mg, n=53; atacicept 150 mg, n=28; §C4 <0.1 g/L; placebo, n=28; atacicept 75 mg, n=32; atacicept 150 mg, n=17; Wk=week; FU=follow-up; IgG=immunoglobulin G; IgA=immunoglobulin A; IgM=immunoglobulin M


Disclosure:

D. A. Isenberg,

Merck Serono,

5;

D. Wofsy,

Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech,

5,

GlaxoSmithKline,

9;

Y. Li,

Employed by EMD Serono,

3;

D. Licu,

Merck Serono S.A.,

3;

S. D. Wax,

Employed by EMD Serono,

3;

C. Gordon,

Merck Serono ,

5,

Merck Serono ,

9;

C. Pena Rossi,

Employed by Merck Serono S.A.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacodynamics-and-predictive-biomarkers-in-patients-treated-with-atacicept-data-from-the-april-sle-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology