ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1161

Perspectives of Radiologist Physicians in the Imaging of Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis

Farzana Nuruzzaman1, Mingqian Huang2, Christian Hedrich3, Hermann Girschick4, Julie Cherian5, T. Shawn Sato6, Karen Onel7, Polly Ferguson8 and Yongdong Zhao9, 1Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 2Mount Sinai Hospital, 10003, NY, 3University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 4Vivantes Children’s Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany, 5Stony Brook Children�s Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 6University of Iowa, Iowa City, 7Pediatric Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 8University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 9University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Autoinflammatory diseases, Pediatric rheumatology, radiography

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II: Systemic JIA, Autoinflammatory, & Scleroderma

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Radiological imaging is integral to the diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) and has been included as a central component in suggested diagnostic criteria [1,2]. Objectives of this study were: 1) to determine imaging modalities and features deemed important by radiologists in the diagnostic workup of suspected CNO cases; 2) to generate input from radiologists regarding monitoring of patients with CNO.

Methods: Population targeted were active attending radiologist physician members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology email list serve. The survey was administered online through RedCap. Descriptive statistics were conducted with continuous variables reported as medians/means and categorical variables as frequencies/percentages.

Results: A total of 66 respondents (5%) consented and completed the survey. The majority were pediatric radiologists, subspecializing in musculoskeletal radiology, with >10 years of experience (Table 1). Radiologists consider CNO in the radiological imaging interpretation differential diagnosis an average of 10 cases per year. 79% and 45% of respondents reported high confidence in identifying imaging features of CNO on whole body MRI (WBMRI) and localized MRI, respectively. The level of confidence drops to 24% and 19% when interpreting X-rays (XRs) and bone scintigraphy, respectively (Figure 1). Among all imaging modalities interpreted “always” in the initial diagnostic workup of potential cases of CNO, XRs (52%) were most commonly interpreted, followed by localized MRI (46%) and WBMRI (35%), which suggested the sequence of utilization of these three imaging modalities in new cases. In established cases of CNO, wherein WBMRI was the most frequently interpreted (48%), followed by localized MRI (26%) and XRs (25%) (Figure 2). Most common imaging features that led respondents to suggest a bone biopsy included disorganized bone formation (64%/56%), moth-eaten appearance (61%/56%), and lytic lesions (50%/44%) on XRs/CTs, respectively as well as the presence of soft tissue mass/swelling(68%/44%) and MRI signal hyperintensity of bone marrow at unifocal site (24%). A majority of respondents preferred a combination of short tau inverse recovery (STIR), T1 and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences in the MRI images of potential CNO cases. 46% of respondents reported using an established WBMRI protocol at their institutions.

Conclusion: WBMRI is considered the most useful imaging modality for initial diagnosis and monitoring of CNO by radiologists. Certain morphological features including disorganized bone structure, moth-eaten appearance, lytic lesions, soft tissue mass/swelling and unifocal signal hyperintensity of bone marrow may result in increased chance of bone biopsy to exclude differential diagnoses. Findings from this survey will promote discussion within a focused group to develop imaging guidelines for the diagnostic workup and disease monitoring in CNO and contribute to earlier diagnosis and individualized care.

[1] Jansson, A et al. “Classification of nonbacterial osteitis.” Rheumatology (Oxford) 46, 1 (2007)
[2] Roderick, MR,et al. “Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO).” Pediatric Rheumatology 14, 47 (2016) 

Baseline characteristics and demographics of survey respondents

Percent reporting high confidence in identifying CNO imaging features, by imaging modality

Percent interpreted imaging modality “always” initial diagnostic workup and longterm imaging monitoring of patients with possible CNO and established CNO, respectively


Disclosure: F. Nuruzzaman, None; M. Huang, None; C. Hedrich, None; H. Girschick, None; J. Cherian, None; T. Sato, None; K. Onel, None; P. Ferguson, NIH/NIAMS R01AR059703, 1, Novartis, 1; Y. Zhao, Novartis, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nuruzzaman F, Huang M, Hedrich C, Girschick H, Cherian J, Sato T, Onel K, Ferguson P, Zhao Y. Perspectives of Radiologist Physicians in the Imaging of Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perspectives-of-radiologist-physicians-in-the-imaging-of-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis-2/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perspectives-of-radiologist-physicians-in-the-imaging-of-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis-2/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology