ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0056

Peripheral Blood Immune Cell Profiling in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparison of Patients with Healthy Controls

Lihi Eder1, Darshini Ganatra2 and Vinod Chandran3, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: immunology, Psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, T-Lymphocyte

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Basic Science Poster (0046–0068)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Heterogeneity in immune cell populations among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may determine disease expression and treatment response. The objective of this study was to compare peripheral blood immune cell profiles in patients with PsA (before- and after- advanced therapy) and healthy controls using mass cytometry.

Methods: Patients with PsA who were initiating treatment with advanced therapies for active peripheral musculoskeletal disease were recruited along with healthy controls. We performed mass cytometry (CyTOF) using a panel of 30 metal-tagged antibodies (Maxpar Direct, Fluidigm) to characterize over 37 immune cell populations in whole blood from patients (before- and 3 months after therapy) and controls. The frequencies of the different immune cells populations were automatically quantified for each sample based on combinations of their associated canonical cellular markers using Probability State Modelling algorithms in a commercially available automated analysis system (MaxparPathsetter, Fluidigm). The levels (counts per 100 cells) of the different cell populations were compared between PsA patients vs. controls and among patients with PsA (before- and after- therapy) using Mann-Whitney U test and cluster analysis was performed using differential cell population levels.

Results: A total of 37 samples from 12 patients with PsA (14 treatment periods) and 9 controls were analyzed. In general, large variability was found in the different cell populations across patients with PsA, while the levels were more homogenous across the controls (Figure 1). Most variability was found in the lymphocytic cells populations, in particular among the T cell sub-populations, thus the analysis was restricted to lymphocytic cells. We found significant differences in T cell sub-populations between PsA and controls (Figures 2). Patients with PsA had higher levels of CD4+ Terminal effector and CD4+ Effector memory T cells, CD4+ Th1 cells and CD4+ regulatory T cells, while higher levels of CD8+ and CD4+ Naïve T cells and gamma-delta T cells were found in controls (Figure 3). No significant differences were found in lymphocytic cell populations before and after advanced therapy. In addition, no significant differences were found in the levels of the following cell types and their sub populations between PsA vs. controls and among PsA patients before and after treatment: B cells, NK cells, granulocytes, monocytes and dendritic cells.

Conclusion: Considerable variability was found in T cell sub-populations among patients with PsA. Differences in the levels of specific T cell populations with a shift towards terminal and memory T cells as well as Th1 axis was seen in patients with PsA compared to control. Whether immune cell profile predict response to advanced therapy in PsA remains to be examined.

Figure 1 – Distribution of the different immune cell populations in PsA and controls

Figure 2 – Clustering of PsA (before and after therapy) and controls of differential cell population levels

Figure 3 – Differences in T cell sub-populations between PsA (before and after therapy) and controls*


Disclosures: L. Eder, Pfizer, 1, 5, UCB, 5, Abbvie, 1, 5, Novartis, 2, Eli Lily, 1, 5, Fluidigm, 5, 12, Family member - employee, Janssen, 5; D. Ganatra, None; V. Chandran, Abbvie, 1, 2, 5, Amgen, 1, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 2, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 12, Spousal employment, Celgene, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Ganatra D, Chandran V. Peripheral Blood Immune Cell Profiling in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparison of Patients with Healthy Controls [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/peripheral-blood-immune-cell-profiling-in-psoriatic-arthritis-comparison-of-patients-with-healthy-controls/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/peripheral-blood-immune-cell-profiling-in-psoriatic-arthritis-comparison-of-patients-with-healthy-controls/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology