ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0580

Performance of Conventional Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Identifying Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Gayathri MS, Aishwarya Gopal, Molly Mary Thabah, Christina Mariaselvam, jaiveer Singh and Chengappa Kavadichanda, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Carotid Artery Disease, Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0543–0581) SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Role of conventional risk scores which predict cardiovascular events, to detect subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE is not established. In this study we assessed the performance of QRESEARCH database risk score-3 (QRISK3), Systemic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), WHO (World Health Organization), Framingham (FRS) and modified Framingham(mFRS) CVD scores in subclinical atherosclerosis and determine clinical associations of the same

Methods: In this single centre cross-sectional analytical study, we enrolled 108 female SLE patients (without CVD) aged 40-60 years and 108 age matched healthy controls. Demography, disease activity, autoantibodies, steroid dose were noted. Subclinical atherosclerosis was defined by presence of either carotid plaque or abnormal carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) on ultrasound. CVD risk scores (QRISK3, SCORE, WHO, FRS and mFRS) were assessed. Agreement between scores was determined using kappa coefficient

Results: Mean age of patients was 46±6 years, median duration of SLE was 72(93)months, median SLEDAI 0(0-8) and SLICC-ACR damage index was 0 (0-3) (Table 1).Subclinical atherosclerosis was present in 55 (51%) SLE [abnormal cIMT-44(41%) and plaque- 17(16%)] and in 52 (48%) controls [abnormal cIMT-46(42%) and plaque 12(11%)].Mean cIMT was comparable (0.62 ±0.2 cm) in cases and controls. All CVD risk scores had low sensitivity but good specificity to identify subclinical atherosclerosis in patients and controls (Table 2). Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), with subclinical atherosclerosis as outcome, showed that all scores had poor discriminatory capacity (Fig 1). In SLE, WHO and FRS had moderate agreement (kappa coefficient k 0.53), QRISK3 and mFRS had substantial agreement (k 0.65) with subclinical atherosclerosis, whereas in controls with FRS and QRISK3, and SCORE and WHO had substantial agreement (k 0.66 and 0.7 respectively) (Table 3). Proportion of patients having triple positive antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher in SLE with subclinical atherosclerosis than without (5.5% vs 0, p=0.04). Renal involvement was significantly less in SLE with subclinical atherosclerosis than without (43.6% vs 69.8%, p=0.006)

Conclusion: Prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis was comparable in SLE and controls (51% vs 48%), though carotid plaques were significantly more prevalent in SLE (17% vs 11%). Sensitivity of conventional CVD scores in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE was poor. Hence, until further scores are validated, screening for subclinical atherosclerosis using carotid ultrasound should remain gold standard

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Comparison of disease parameters between SLE patients with and without subclinical atherosclerosis

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: ROC curves for CVD scores in SLE cases and controls

Supporting image 3

Table 2: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predicitve value, and Negative predictive value of CVD risk scores in identifying subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE and controls
Table 3: Agreement between the CVD risk scores measured with the Kappa coefficient


Disclosures: G. MS: None; A. Gopal: None; M. Mary Thabah: None; C. Mariaselvam: None; j. Singh: None; C. Kavadichanda: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

MS G, Gopal A, Mary Thabah M, Mariaselvam C, Singh j, Kavadichanda C. Performance of Conventional Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Identifying Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-conventional-cardiovascular-risk-scores-in-identifying-subclinical-atherosclerosis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-conventional-cardiovascular-risk-scores-in-identifying-subclinical-atherosclerosis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology