ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 213

Perception of Access to Mental Health Services in Publicly Insured Vs Privately Insured Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Elizabeth Soto-Cardona, Jackie Szymonifka and Robert F. Spiera, Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Access to care, insurance and mental health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: ARHP Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To assess perception of access to mental health services (MHS) and utilization of those services based on participant’s insurance type. We compared responses of participants with public insurance (Medicare and Medicaid) and private insurance receiving rheumatologic care at an urban academic medical center.

Methods: Patients with rheumatic diseases seen in clinic and in private practices at a tertiary care academic medical center underwent a standardized interview by a single interviewer. Patient reported utilization of medical care and mental health services, as well as perceptions of access to those services was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Socio-demographic variables were collected. Health characteristics included rheumatological diagnosis, physical functional status and mental health, measured by the SF36. High scores, reported on a scale from 0 to 100, define a more favorable health state. Responses from patients with public health insurance were compared to those with private commercial insurance.

Results: Participants with private insurance were more likely to be white (p=.037), married (p=.001) and home owners (p <.001), whereas participants with public insurance where more likely to be disabled (p=.074) and diagnosed with RA (p=.022) or SLE (p=.022). Those with private insurance scored higher on the SF-36 and were less likely to recognize role limitations due to emotional problems (p=.028), score lower for pain (p=.019) and to report worse physical function (p=.006). [Table 1]

Conclusion:

Of the 52 participants only 34 had received MHS in the past, 13/34 (38%) of public insurance patients, and 21/34 (61%) of private patients. Patients with public insurance were less likely to perceive barriers to access to mental health services than were those with private insurance, although that difference did not reach statistical significance (59% vs 24%, p= 0.227). In terms of relative ease of access to MHS vs physical health specifically, 38% of participants with public insurance felt they had less access to MHS than to medical services in general where as 61% of private practice patients reported perceiving less access to MHS (p=.041) than to medical services in general. The majority of participants in both private (76%) and clinic settings (76%) felt access to MHS was important to their well-being. Conclusion: Patients with rheumatic diseases commonly value the importance of mental health services, but frequently perceive barriers to access those services. Perhaps surprisingly, patients with public insurance were less likely to perceive such barriers than those privately insured. Future investigations should focus on identifying those specific barriers to mental health access for private and publicly insured patients in order to facilitate provision of such services.

Table 1. SF-36 component scores by insurance type

SF-36 component

All patients

(n=52)

Medicare or
Medicaid

(n=25)

Private insurance

(n=27)

p-value

Emotional well-being

74 [54, 88]

72 [56, 88]

76 [48, 88]

0.912

Energy/fatigue

48 [30, 73]

50 [30, 70]

45 [30, 75]

0.854

General health

43 [25, 60]

50 [25, 60]

40 [25, 60]

0.497

Pain

51 [23, 73]

33 [20, 68]

58 [45, 78]

0.019

Physical functioning

43 [25, 70]

35 [25, 50]

60 [40, 80]

0.006

Role limitations due to emotional problems

100 [0, 100]

33 [0, 100]

100 [33, 100]

0.028

Role limitations due to physical health

0 [0, 50]

0 [0, 25]

25 [0, 100]

0.070

Social functioning

63 [50, 88]

63 [38, 75]

75 [50, 88]

0.570


Disclosure: E. Soto-Cardona, None; J. Szymonifka, None; R. F. Spiera, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Soto-Cardona E, Szymonifka J, Spiera RF. Perception of Access to Mental Health Services in Publicly Insured Vs Privately Insured Patients with Rheumatic Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perception-of-access-to-mental-health-services-in-publicly-insured-vs-privately-insured-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perception-of-access-to-mental-health-services-in-publicly-insured-vs-privately-insured-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology