ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2112

Patterns of Medication Use Before, During, and After Pregnancy Among Women with Systematic Lupus Erythematosus: A Population-Based Study

Mary De Vera1, Eric C. Sayre2, Corisande Baldwin3, Jessica Galo4 and J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta5, 1University of British Columbia Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 3Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Rheumatology, Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: medication and pregnancy, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affects women during childbearing years. Given the limited data on perinatal medication use among patients, our objective was to characterize real-world therapy patterns among women with SLE before, during, and after pregnancy.

Methods: Our data include all visits to health professionals and all hospital admissions from Jan 1, 1990 to Dec 31, 2010 and all dispensed medications from Sept 1, 1995 to Dec 31, 2010. The case definition for SLE was: a) diagnosis of SLE on at least two visits within a two-year period between Jan 1996 and Dec 2010 by a non-rheumatologist physician; or b) diagnosis of SLE on at least one visit by a rheumatologist or from hospitalization.  Cases with an ICD-9 code for SLE prior to 1996 were excluded. From this, we assembled a cohort of women, aged 18 or older, with pregnancies ending in a delivery as identified using ICD-9 codes in the hospitalization database. We calculated the estimated date of conception (EDC) as the date of delivery minus 270 days and created the following periods: 1) pre-conception 1 (91-180 days before EDC); 2) pre-conception 2 (90 days before EDC); 3) 1st trimester; 4) 2nd trimester; 5) 3rd trimester; 6) post-delivery 1 (90 days after delivery); and 7) post-delivery 2 (91 – 180 days after delivery). Using information on prescription date and days’ supply, we determined the use of medications including disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics, glucocorticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for each period.

Results: We identified 100 pregnancies with delivery date at age 18-45 and at least 450 days after SLE onset, from an incident cohort of 4,297 women with SLE. At delivery, mean age was 32.1 ± 4.4 years and SLE duration was 3.8 ± 1.9 years. We tabulated the proportion of exposed pregnancies according to each period and medication class (Table). The majority of DMARD pregnancy exposures were to hydroxychloroquine and/or chloroquine (41 to 45% of exposed pregnancy trimesters).  In contrast to the decline in use during pregnancy compared to pre-conception periods for DMARDs and NSAIDs, we observed an increase in glucocorticosteroid exposures during pregnancy, as well as post-delivery.

Conclusion: This population-based study provide data on real-world patterns of perinatal medication use among women with SLE. Findings emphasize the importance of counseling women regarding childbearing decisions as well as the need for evaluation of the risk-benefit profiles of medications in pregnancy.

 

Exposed SLE Pregnancies (%)

 

Pre-conception 1

Pre-conception 2

1st trimester

2nd trimester

3rd trimester

Post-delivery 1

Post-delivery 2

DMARDs

52

49

50

45

45

45

52

Biologics

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Glucocorticosteroids

19

21

22

24

26

30

23

NSAIDs

9

14

10

9

8

12

11

 

 

 


Disclosure:

M. De Vera,
None;

E. C. Sayre,
None;

C. Baldwin,
None;

J. Galo,
None;

J. A. Avina-Zubieta,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-medication-use-before-during-and-after-pregnancy-among-women-with-systematic-lupus-erythematosus-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology