ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 267

Patterns of Access to Prescription Medications Among Lupus Cases and Controls in the Population-Based Michigan Lupus Epidemiology & Surveillance (MILES) Cohort

Deeba Minhas1, Wendy Marder1, Siobán Harlow2, Suzanna Zick3, Afton L. Hassett4, Kamil E. Barbour5, Charles G. Helmick5, Caroline Gordon6, Jiha Lee1, Amrita Padda1, W. Joseph McCune1 and Emily C. Somers1, 1Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Epidemiology Department- School of Public Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology- Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 4Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Arthritis Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 6University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: access to care and medication, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Medication access and adherence are important issues in determining patient outcomes.  We investigated sociodemographic factors and disparities associated with prescription medication access in a population-based cohort of lupus patients and controls.

Methods: Detailed data on prescription access and sociodemographics were collected at the MILES baseline visit by structured interview.  We compared access between cases and frequency-matched controls (using chi-squared tests) and examined factors associated with access in separate multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: 654 participants (462 SLE cases, 192 controls) completed the MILES Cohort baseline visit; 584 (89.3%) female, 288 (44%) black, and mean age 53 years.  SLE patients were significantly more likely than controls to report the following in the preceding 12 months to save money: skipping doses, taking less medicine, delaying filling prescriptions and asking their doctor for a lower cost medication (Table 1).

Table 1.  Self-reported prescription access within the preceding 12 months in SLE cases compared to frequency-matched controls.

 

                  Questionnaire Item

SLE cases (n=462)

n (%)

Controls (n=192)

n (%)

p-value

Unable to get Rxs doctor felt necessary?

56 (12.1)

18 (9.4)

NS

Skipped med doses to save money?

62 (13.4)

12 (6.3)

0.008

Taken less medicine to save money?

70 (15.2)

11 (5.7)

0.001

Delayed filling a Rx to save money?

75 (16.2)

17 (8.9)

0.013

Asked doctor for lower cost medication to save money?

110 (23.8)

30 (15.6)

0.02

Bought Rx from another country to save money?

5 (1.08)

2 (1.04)

NS

Used alternative therapies to save money?

38 (8.2)

11 (5.7)

NS

NS=not significant

Based on multivariable models (Figure 1), having SLE was associated with several types of limitations in medication access, after adjusting for sex, race, age, insurance status, and income level.  Household income below the US median was also associated with limitations in medication access, whereas private insurance was generally associated with improved access.  Black persons were less likely to ask their doctor for lower cost alternatives.

Figure 1.  Forest plots from a series of multivariable models of factors associated with aspects of prescription medication access and adherence.  Squares represent positive odds ratios (ORs), circles negative ORs, triangles not significant ORs; horizontal lines represent 95% CIs.

 

Conclusion: SLE patients were more likely than controls from the general population to experience limitations in prescription medication access, and less than 1 in 4 patients asked providers for lower cost medications.  Further, disparities in access were found in association with income, race and insurance status.  Consideration of medication costs in patient decision making could provide a meaningful avenue for improving patient access and adherence to medications.


Disclosure: D. Minhas, None; W. Marder, None; S. Harlow, None; S. Zick, None; A. L. Hassett, AbbVie Inc., 5, 9; K. E. Barbour, None; C. G. Helmick, None; C. Gordon, None; J. Lee, None; A. Padda, None; W. J. McCune, None; E. C. Somers, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Minhas D, Marder W, Harlow S, Zick S, Hassett AL, Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Gordon C, Lee J, Padda A, McCune WJ, Somers EC. Patterns of Access to Prescription Medications Among Lupus Cases and Controls in the Population-Based Michigan Lupus Epidemiology & Surveillance (MILES) Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-access-to-prescription-medications-among-lupus-cases-and-controls-in-the-population-based-michigan-lupus-epidemiology-surveillance-miles-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-access-to-prescription-medications-among-lupus-cases-and-controls-in-the-population-based-michigan-lupus-epidemiology-surveillance-miles-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology