ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 350

Patients with Gout Consider Zero Flares over the Previous Six or Twelve Months Necessary for a Remission State

William J. Taylor1, Nicola Dalbeth2, Kenneth Saag3, Jasvinder A. Singh4, Elizabeth J. Rahn5, Amy S. Mudano6, Yi-Hsing Chen7, Ching-Tsai Lin8, Paul Tan2, Worawit Louthrenoo9, Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado10, Hansel Hernández-Llinas11, Tuhina Neogi12, Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos12, Geraldo Castelar-Pinheiro13, Rodrigo B. Chaves-Amorim13, Till Uhlig14, Hilde B Hammer14, Maxim Eliseev15, Fernando Perez-Ruiz16, Lorenzo Cavagna17, Geraldine M. McCarthy18, Lisa K. Stamp19, Martijin Gerritsen20, Viktoria Fana21, Francisca Sivera22 and Angelo L. Gaffo5, 1University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand, 2University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 3Division Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 8Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 9Div of Rheumatology, Dept of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 10Rheumatology, Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 11Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 12Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 13Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 14Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 15V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russian Federation, 16Servicio de Reumatología, Vizcaya, Spain, 17Division of Rheumatology, University and IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy, 18Div of Rheumatology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 19University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, 20Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands, 21Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Copenhagen, Denmark, 22Sección de Reumatología, Hospital General Universitario de Elda., Elda, Spain

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: gout, outcome measures and patient-reported outcome measures

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment targets for gout generally focus on serum urate, but patient-centred targets may be equally important. We seek to determine the relationship between gout flare rates and patient self-classification into 3 disease activity states: remission (no symptoms of disease), low disease activity (LDA, no symptoms of disease that require additional therapy), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS, level of symptoms acceptable to the patient).

Methods: Patients with 2015 ACR/EULAR gout criteria attending rheumatology clinics in 17 countries were asked to recall the number of flares over the preceding 6 and 12 months. For each time horizon they were asked to consider whether they thought their gout had gone away (remission), didn’t require any additional or stronger therapy (LDA) or was controlled to their satisfaction (PASS). Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the association between being in each disease state, flare count and self-reported current flare. A distribution-based approach and 3-state analysis of the volume under a ROC surface (VUS) with extended Youden index identified possible flare count thresholds for each state.

Results: 512 patients were recruited with mean (SD) age 58 (14) years, 89% were male, and disease duration of 12 (10) years. The states of LDA/PASS were combined since the distribution of recalled flares was very similar for these states. Each recalled flare reduced the likelihood of self-classified remission by 52% for 6 months and 23% for 12 months, and the likelihood of LDA/PASS by 15% and 5% for 6 and 12 months, respectively (Table).  Not currently self-reporting a flare was strongly associated with self-classification into remission (OR 15.20 for 6 months and 15.13 for 12 months) or LDA/PASS (OR 5.74 for 6 months and 5.13 for 12 months) (Table). The VUS for 6-month flare count was 0.41 (95%CI 0.36 to 0.46) and the thresholds identified from the extended Youden index were 0 and 3.5; for 12-month flare count, the VUS was 0.38 (95%CI 0.33 to 0.43) and thresholds were 0 and 4.5. A threshold of 0 flares in preceding 6 and 12 months was associated with accurate classification  of remission in 58% and 56% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion: Recalled flares are significantly associated with patient perceptions of disease activity in gout, supporting flare as an important target of therapy. Zero flares over prior 6 or 12 months were necessary for most patients to self-categorise as remission. Current flare is strongly associated with perception of disease activity, independently of the number of prior flares. However, recalled flare counts alone do not fully predict self-categorised states, suggesting that other factors may also contribute to perception of gout disease activity.  

 

Table. Association between self-categorized disease state and recalled flares and current flare.

 

Disease activity category*

OR (95% CI)‡

p-value

Considering the previous 6 months

Remission

No. of flares

0.48 (0.38 to 0.60)

<0.001

Current flare absent†

15.20 (5.58 to 41.37)

<0.001

LDA/Pass

No. of flares

0.85 (0.79 to 0.90)

<0.001

Current flare absent

5.74 (3.51 to 9.37)

<0.001

Considering the previous 12 months

Remission

No. of flares

0.77 (0.70 to 0.85)

<0.001

 

Current flare absent†

15.13 (5.68 to 40.34)

<0.001

LDA/Pass

No. of flares

0.95 (0.92 to 0.97)

<0.001

 

Current flare absent

5.35 (3.33 to 8.60)

<0.001

* The reference category is: Not in any of the 3 low disease activity states.

† The reference category is: Current flare present

‡ The OR are derived from a multinomial logistic regression model (separate models for 6 and 12 months), where the dependent variable was disease activity category and the independent variables were flare count and presence/absence of current flare

 


Disclosure: W. J. Taylor, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, 5; N. Dalbeth, AstraZeneca, 2,Takeda, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Cymabay, Crealta, 5,Takeda, AstraZeneca, 9; K. Saag, AstraZeneca, Horizon, Ironwood, SOBI, Takeda, 5; J. A. Singh, Takeda, Savient, 2,Savient, Takeda, Regenron, Merz, Bioiberica, Crealta, Allergan, WebMD, UBM LLC, American College of Rheumatology, 5; E. J. Rahn, None; A. S. Mudano, None; Y. H. Chen, None; C. T. Lin, None; P. Tan, None; W. Louthrenoo, None; J. Vazquez-Mellado, None; H. Hernández-Llinas, None; T. Neogi, None; A. B. Vargas-Santos, None; G. Castelar-Pinheiro, None; R. B. Chaves-Amorim, None; T. Uhlig, None; H. B. Hammer, None; M. Eliseev, None; F. Perez-Ruiz, Ardea Biosciences, AstraZeneca, Cymabay, Grunenthal, Menarini, 5; L. Cavagna, None; G. M. McCarthy, None; L. K. Stamp, None; M. Gerritsen, None; V. Fana, None; F. Sivera, AstraZeneca, 5; A. L. Gaffo, SOBI, 5,Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Taylor WJ, Dalbeth N, Saag K, Singh JA, Rahn EJ, Mudano AS, Chen YH, Lin CT, Tan P, Louthrenoo W, Vazquez-Mellado J, Hernández-Llinas H, Neogi T, Vargas-Santos AB, Castelar-Pinheiro G, Chaves-Amorim RB, Uhlig T, Hammer HB, Eliseev M, Perez-Ruiz F, Cavagna L, McCarthy GM, Stamp LK, Gerritsen M, Fana V, Sivera F, Gaffo AL. Patients with Gout Consider Zero Flares over the Previous Six or Twelve Months Necessary for a Remission State [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-with-gout-consider-zero-flares-over-the-previous-six-or-twelve-months-necessary-for-a-remission-state/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-with-gout-consider-zero-flares-over-the-previous-six-or-twelve-months-necessary-for-a-remission-state/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology