ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1163

Patients’ Insights About Hydroxychloroquine, and Patient-Recommended Strategies to Target Nonadherence

Shivani Garg1, Betty Chewning1, Noah Kaitz1, Shelby Gomez1 and Christie Bartels2, 1UW Madison, Madison, WI, 2University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Hydroxychloroquine, patient insights, patient recommended strategies, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster III: Patient Preferences (1153–1169)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is the cornerstone of SLE therapy as it improves damage-free survival in all SLE patients. Yet, in new users, as few as 17% of SLE patients took HCQ as recommended for a year increasing risk of poor SLE outcomes and early death. Moreover, Black patients and those from disadvantaged backgrounds have a 2-fold higher HCQ nonadherence rate, which contributes to worse SLE outcomes and health disparities. This highlights that diverse SLE patients could have different perspectives about HCQ and unique barriers to adherence. Yet, most adherence interventions lack diverse patients’ insights or tailored strategies addressing their unique challenges with HCQ. Therefore, using qualitative descriptive analysis we aimed to examine diverse SLE patients’ perspectives on: insights and priorities about HCQ adherence, and the most valuable and actionable adherence strategies.

Methods: We recruited 11 patients with SLE from Madison (28% non-White; 17% living in poverty) and Milwaukee, Wisconsin (56% non-White; 40% living in poverty) who were identified with a history of nonadherence or actively struggling with taking HCQ. We used purposeful sampling to recruit diverse SLE patients (e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, social challenges identified by using social determinants of health documented in the EHR.). Using four 90-minute semi-structured focus groups, facilitators first asked patients to share their perspectives on HCQ, insights and concerns about HCQ that lead to reduced adherence. Next, patients participated in discussing and prioritizing strategies to address their concerns and improve their adherence. All meetings were audio-recorded and transcribed. Using content analysis, we analyzed transcripts from each meeting.

Results: Eleven patients participated in focus group meetings (attendance – 100% meetings 1-3, 90% 4th meeting); 60% were age ≤ 40 years, 10% male, 40% had disease duration ≤5 years, 70% were non-White, 40% with social challenges, 50% Milwaukee area, and 40% had severe CNS or renal SLE.

“Long-term concerns” and “worry”, and “side-effects from HCQ” were the most frequently mentioned words or phrases during the initial focus group meeting where patients shared their perspectives and insights about HCQ (Figure 1A). Qualitative analysis identified eight themes regarding adherence based on patients’ discussions about their insights and concerns about HCQ; sub-analysis revealed inter-relationships schematically shown in Figure 1B. The most commonly coded themes and subcategories are in Table 1. Finally, we categorized all patient-suggested strategies, which were ranked by patients from most valuable to least valuable in addressing underlying concerns and barriers in the real world (Table 2).

Conclusion: Our study provide new insights regarding inter-related themes and insights about HCQ adherence, and patient-suggested and prioritized strategies will be most valuable for future interventions. Our study brings diverse patient voices to redesign adherence intervention in SLE by using a multifaceted patient-insight informed approach and patient-recommended strategies.

Figure 1. 1A. Patient perspectives and insights about HCQ. The size of the word/phrase matches the listed frequency. 1B. Conceptual scheme showing inter-relationships between themes from analysis of patients’ insights about HCQ adherence during four 90-minute focus group meetings (n=11 patients). Note that the size of circles reflects frequency of each theme and the overlap area between circles represents the frequency when both themes were referenced within a quote.

Table 1. Eight Themes Highlighting Patients’ Insights And Concerns About HCQ

Table 2. Six Themes Highlighting Patient-Suggested & Ranked Strategies To Address Patient Concerns & Barriers


Disclosures: S. Garg, None; B. Chewning, None; N. Kaitz, None; S. Gomez, None; C. Bartels, Pfizer, Independent Grants for Learning and Change, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garg S, Chewning B, Kaitz N, Gomez S, Bartels C. Patients’ Insights About Hydroxychloroquine, and Patient-Recommended Strategies to Target Nonadherence [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-insights-about-hydroxychloroquine-and-patient-recommended-strategies-to-target-nonadherence/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-insights-about-hydroxychloroquine-and-patient-recommended-strategies-to-target-nonadherence/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology