ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0175

Patient Satisfaction with a New Patient Video Triage Program

Adam Dore1 and Yue Yin2, 1Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Access to care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0175–0198) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: To assist with lowering new rheumatology patient appointment wait times, our division initiated a New Patient Video Triage Program in 2023. In this program, we found the average wait time for a new video triage appointment was less than half of an in-person new patient appointment. However, it was not understood if patients had a positive experience with a new patient video triage visit. Given this, we initiated a patient questionnaire to better understand the patients’ satisfaction of the new patient video triage visit.

Methods: Patients completing a video visit through our New Patient Video Triage Program between March, 2024 and February, 2025 were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire (Table 1) included 7 questions and basic demographic information. The answers were received anonymously. Descriptive statistics were initially reported. Continuous variable was reported as mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage. ANOVA or t-test were conducted to compare continuous variables between groups. Fisher’s exact test was conducted to examine the association between categorical variables. To control the Type I error rate, Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to adjust p values. All statistical analyses were conducted under alpha level .05 via SAS 9.4.

Results: 208 surveys were completed. Most of those responding were female (83%) and identified as white/Caucasian (95%). The majority were extremely satisfied with the overall experience of the appointment (81%), the timeliness of the appointment being scheduled (67%), the attentiveness shown towards the patients’ concerns (89%), the amount of time spent with the provider (86%), and the outcome of the appointment (74%). Almost all who responded would recommend a similar new patient video visit to others (96%) and only 14% of patients had technology issues during the visit (Table 2). According to Table 3, except the timeliness of scheduling, all survey items were significantly associated with the patients’ overall recommendation of a similar appointment to others (all p = .0008), indicating that patients who would not recommend the video visit to others were more likely to be disappointed in the other four aspects and patients who would recommend the video visit to others were more likely to be satisfied in the other four areas. Experiencing a technological issue during the video visit was not significantly associated with the satisfaction of the appointment (all p > .05).

Conclusion: Our New Patient Video Triage Program previously showed success in lowering rheumatology new patient wait times. Reassuringly, in this study we have shown that most patients completing the new patient video triage visit and questionnaire were extremely satisfied with the visit and would recommend a similar appointment to others. Having technological issues during the appointment did not impact the patient’s satisfaction and there was not one area that led to overall satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Given these findings, we plan to continue utilizing new patient video triage appointments.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Patient Questionnaire

Supporting image 2Table 2: Descriptive Statistic Results

Supporting image 3Table 3: Variable Comparison for Patients’ Recommendation to Others


Disclosures: A. Dore: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 2, UCB, 6; Y. Yin: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dore A, Yin Y. Patient Satisfaction with a New Patient Video Triage Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-satisfaction-with-a-new-patient-video-triage-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-satisfaction-with-a-new-patient-video-triage-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology