ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2967

Patient Reported Pain By the Paindetect Questionnaire Reveals Multimodal Elements to Pain Perception in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Saqa Ahmed1, Tejal Magan1, Mario Vargas1, Abiola Harrison1 and Nidhi Sofat2, 1Rheumatology, Mailpoint J1A, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, pain, patient questionnaires and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects II/Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune condition typified by systemic inflammation targeted towards synovial joints. Inhibition of pro-inflammatory networks by disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs e.g. methotrexate and biologic therapies including TNFα inhibitors, often leads to suppression of disease activity. However, despite the era of widespread use of disease-modifying treatments, there remain significant groups of patients who continue to experience pain.

Methods:

Our study formulated a pain assessment tool to be used in the arthritis clinic to assess feasibility of measurements including the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain (range 0-100 mm) and painDETECT questionnaires (range 0-38) to evaluate neuropathic features of pain in people with established RA (n=100). Clinical measures of disease activity (DAS28), disease-modifying medication use, body mass index (BMI) and worst pain ever were also recorded. Continuous data was described and analysed using parametric statistics, with ANOVA and Chi-squared tests for groups with 3 or more categories.

Results:

We found that participants with RA reported relatively high pain levels, despite widespread use of disease-modifying drugs (Table 1). The majority, 54%, reported ‘severe pain’ on the visual analogue scale (VAS), which identifies people with a VAS of 54-100 mm as having the highest severity of pain. The mean DAS28 in the group was 2.09 ± 0.96. The majority of subjects had duration of diagnosis greater than or equal to 5 years (84%), suggesting that pain was a persisting symptom despite sustained use of disease-modifying agents and a DAS28 score suggesting clinical remission. All participants evaluated had been stable on DMARD therapy for at least 3 months prior to completing the study and had not required a change in their treatment, or addition of corticosteroid therapy during that time. The majority of participants were being treated with disease-modifying drugs, including the commonest agent, methotrexate (82%). Using the painDETECT questionnaire, 67% of patients had unlikely neuropathic pain. A significantly high proportion of 28% subjects had possible neuropathic pain and 5% had features of likely neuropathic pain by painDETECT scoring. We found a positive correlation between VAS and painDETECT (r2=0.757). Of note, the group who had likely or probable neuropathic pain also showed significantly increased pain reporting by VAS (p < 0.01). Subjects who were clinically obese (BMI > 30) had statistically higher proportions of pain reporting (VAS 89.0 ± 0.7) compared with subjects who had a normal BMI (VAS 45.2 ± 21.8), p<0.05.

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that multimodal features of pain perception exist in RA, including neuropathic and sensitisation elements, perhaps explaining why a subgroup of people with RA continue to experience ongoing pain, despite their apparent suppression of inflammation.

Table 1.


Disclosure:

S. Ahmed,
None;

T. Magan,
None;

M. Vargas,
None;

A. Harrison,
None;

N. Sofat,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-pain-by-the-paindetect-questionnaire-reveals-multimodal-elements-to-pain-perception-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology