ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1161

Patient Preferences for Hydroxychloroquine in Systemic Lupus (SLE)

Jennifer Dollinger1, Celline Brasil1, Marcus Wong1, Glen Hazlewood2, Ryan Dollinger1, Wendy Singer3, Christian Pineau4, Evelyne Vinet5, Ann Clarke2, Jennifer Lee1 and Sasha Bernatsky4, 1Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, 4McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5McGill University Health Centre, Mont Royal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Drug toxicity, Qualitative Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster III: Patient Preferences (1153–1169)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Although hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been shown to reduce SLE flares, concerns exist regarding side effects from long-term use. Very little information is available on patient preferences regarding decisions to continue, lower, or stop the drug. To address these knowledge gaps, we evaluated patient experiences and preferences for HCQ therapy and qualitatively assessed themes underlying these preferences.

Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with patients recruited from two Canadian SLE clinical cohorts. The interviews were conducted in English and French using a standardized script. The interview recordings were transcribed, and French transcripts were translated to English. Two reviewers conducted a thematic analysis by individually generating codebooks and mutually ruling out discrepancies.

Results: We completed a thematic analysis of 42 interviews. The majority (N=38, 90%) of subjects were female. Average age was 55.7 (SD 13.0) and most subjects (N=32, 76%) were Caucasian; the rest were Black (N=4, 10%), Asian (N=4, 10%) and other races/ethnicities (N=2, 5%). Concepts emerging from interviews centred around past experiences with dose changes, who (patient/physician) makes those decisions, and current patient preferences (Table 1). Over the course of SLE, 35.7% of patients had stopped and 52.4% had lowered HCQ. Most decisions were made by physicians, but almost a fourth of patients had made a decision to lower or stop HCQ without communicating with their doctor. Though most patients preferred their dose at status quo (to avoid flares), over a third were interested in lowering, stopping, or increasing HCQ. Themes around preferences included SLE control, trust in the provider’s decisions, management of other medications, HCQ safety, and HCQ effectiveness (Table 2). We observed some differences in preferences across patient characteristics (Table 3). A higher proportion of non-Caucasians (80% vs 50% of Caucasians) and of the 10 youngest patients (60% vs 30% of the 10 oldest patients) preferred maintaining their current dose. Concerns about toxicities emerged in the interviews (Table 2). A limitation of our study is that most of our patients had long-established disease, with only about 10% having more recent-onset disease.

Conclusion: In this sample, most patients preferred maintaining their current HCQ dose to avoid SLE flares. However, concerns about toxicities emerged in the interviews, and several patients would prefer decreasing or stopping treatment, but respected physician recommendations. Awareness of these results may help patients and physicians navigate shared decision making. Studies like ours could also contribute to making SLE treatment guidelines more patient-centred and personalized.


Disclosures: J. Dollinger, None; C. Brasil, None; M. Wong, None; G. Hazlewood, None; R. Dollinger, None; W. Singer, None; C. Pineau, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Abbvie, 2, Teva, 2, Gilead, 2; E. Vinet, None; A. Clarke, AstraZeneca, 2, GSK, 6, BMS, 2, Exagen Diagnostics, 2; J. Lee, None; S. Bernatsky, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dollinger J, Brasil C, Wong M, Hazlewood G, Dollinger R, Singer W, Pineau C, Vinet E, Clarke A, Lee J, Bernatsky S. Patient Preferences for Hydroxychloroquine in Systemic Lupus (SLE) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-hydroxychloroquine-in-systemic-lupus-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-hydroxychloroquine-in-systemic-lupus-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology