ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2368

Patient Preferences for Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Caylib Durand1, Maysoon Eldoma1, Deborah A. Marshall2 and Glen Hazlewood1,3, 1Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, DMARDs, patient preferences, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and shared dicision making

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment choices in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involve trade-offs in risks, benefits and other considerations such as dosing. Understanding patient preferences for these trade-offs is critical for making patient-centred treatment recommendations. The objective of this study was to summarize patients’ preferences for disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in RA.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify English-language studies in adult RA patients that measured patients’ preferences for DMARDs or health states and treatment outcomes relevant to DMARD decisions. We included any study that provided a quantitative assessment of patient preferences, which was defined according to the MeSH definition in the National Library of Medicine as an “individual’s expression of desirability or value of one course of action, outcome, or selection in contrast to others”. Study quality was assessed using a published quality assessment tool. Data on the importance of treatment attributes and associations with patient characteristics was summarized across studies.

Results: From 7951 abstracts, we included 36 studies, from a variety of countries. Most studies were in patients with established RA and were rated as medium (n=19) or high quality (n=12). The methods to elicit preferences varied, with the most common being discrete choice experiment (DCE) (n=13). Twenty two were focused on decision-making between advanced therapeutics. Despite heterogeneity of attributes in DCE studies, collectively, treatment benefits were usually more important than both serious and non-serious adverse events. Dosing and administration attributes were typically less important than benefits while route and frequency were more important than adverse events. Risk tolerance varied considerably and 3 out of 5 studies showed patients preferred subcutaneous over intravenous therapy. Patient preferences were more commonly associated with sociodemographic variables rather than RA disease characteristics.

Conclusion: Overall, the results support current RA intensive ‘treat-to-target’ treatment paradigms, but the variability in preferences highlights the need to individualize treatment choices in a shared decision-making context.


Disclosure: C. Durand, None; M. Eldoma, None; D. A. Marshall, None; G. Hazlewood, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Durand C, Eldoma M, Marshall DA, Hazlewood G. Patient Preferences for Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drug-treatment-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drug-treatment-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology