ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

Abstract Number: 2373

Patient Preference for Display of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: Wording Emphasis, Question Format, and Navigation Button Placement

Laura Khurana1, Ellen Durand1, Sarah Gary1, Tony Otero1, Chris Hall1, Aisling Ryan2, Christopher J. Evans2 and Susan Dallabrida1, 1ERT, Boston, MA, 2Endpoint Outcomes, Boston, MA

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: clinical trials, MHealth, patient engagement and patient participation, PRO

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are a reliable method for collecting patient data in osteoarthritis clinical trials and offer many advantages over paper collection; however, it is essential to consider patient preference and ease of use when employing this technology. Improving the usability of ePRO in osteoarthritis clinical trials could ultimately reduce subject burden and improve subject engagement.

Methods:  104 subjects with osteoarthritis were surveyed regarding their preferences for ePRO display.

Results:  When presented with options for showing emphasis in a sentence, subjects thought that underlining best drew attention to emphasized words (36%), followed by bold (35%) or capitalized (21%) lettering. Subjects were shown screens of a multi-select question formatted to read left to right (question to the left of the answers) or top to bottom (question above the answers). 39% could read and understand the screens equally. Of those with a preference, 75% preferred the top to bottom format. Subjects were shown screens of a tablet computer ePRO device with either one question per screen or several multi-select questions per screen in a matrix format. 68% preferred one question per screen; of these subjects, 58% thought it was easier to read and 45% thought it was easier to understand the question. 32% preferred multiple questions per screen; of these subjects, 50% thought it was faster to complete and 38% thought it was easier to read. Subjects were shown two screens with “back” and “next” navigation buttons at either the top or bottom of the screen. 28% thought it was equally easy to find the buttons; of those with a preference, 76% preferred them at the bottom of the screen.

Conclusion:  When possible, questionnaire designers should consider these results to incorporate patient preference into the design of ePRO instruments; potentially reducing subject burden and increasing patient engagement in clinical trials.


Disclosure: L. Khurana, ERT, 3; E. Durand, ERT, 3; S. Gary, ERT, 3; T. Otero, ERT, 3; C. Hall, ERT, 3; A. Ryan, Endpoint Outcomes, 3; C. J. Evans, Endpoint Outcomes, 3; S. Dallabrida, ERT, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khurana L, Durand E, Gary S, Otero T, Hall C, Ryan A, Evans CJ, Dallabrida S. Patient Preference for Display of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: Wording Emphasis, Question Format, and Navigation Button Placement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preference-for-display-of-electronic-patient-reported-outcomes-in-osteoarthritis-clinical-trials-wording-emphasis-question-format-and-navigation-button-placement/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preference-for-display-of-electronic-patient-reported-outcomes-in-osteoarthritis-clinical-trials-wording-emphasis-question-format-and-navigation-button-placement/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology