ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2373

Patient Preference for Display of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: Wording Emphasis, Question Format, and Navigation Button Placement

Laura Khurana1, Ellen Durand1, Sarah Gary1, Tony Otero1, Chris Hall1, Aisling Ryan2, Christopher J. Evans2 and Susan Dallabrida1, 1ERT, Boston, MA, 2Endpoint Outcomes, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: clinical trials, MHealth, patient engagement and patient participation, PRO

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are a reliable method for collecting patient data in osteoarthritis clinical trials and offer many advantages over paper collection; however, it is essential to consider patient preference and ease of use when employing this technology. Improving the usability of ePRO in osteoarthritis clinical trials could ultimately reduce subject burden and improve subject engagement.

Methods:  104 subjects with osteoarthritis were surveyed regarding their preferences for ePRO display.

Results:  When presented with options for showing emphasis in a sentence, subjects thought that underlining best drew attention to emphasized words (36%), followed by bold (35%) or capitalized (21%) lettering. Subjects were shown screens of a multi-select question formatted to read left to right (question to the left of the answers) or top to bottom (question above the answers). 39% could read and understand the screens equally. Of those with a preference, 75% preferred the top to bottom format. Subjects were shown screens of a tablet computer ePRO device with either one question per screen or several multi-select questions per screen in a matrix format. 68% preferred one question per screen; of these subjects, 58% thought it was easier to read and 45% thought it was easier to understand the question. 32% preferred multiple questions per screen; of these subjects, 50% thought it was faster to complete and 38% thought it was easier to read. Subjects were shown two screens with “back” and “next” navigation buttons at either the top or bottom of the screen. 28% thought it was equally easy to find the buttons; of those with a preference, 76% preferred them at the bottom of the screen.

Conclusion:  When possible, questionnaire designers should consider these results to incorporate patient preference into the design of ePRO instruments; potentially reducing subject burden and increasing patient engagement in clinical trials.


Disclosure: L. Khurana, ERT, 3; E. Durand, ERT, 3; S. Gary, ERT, 3; T. Otero, ERT, 3; C. Hall, ERT, 3; A. Ryan, Endpoint Outcomes, 3; C. J. Evans, Endpoint Outcomes, 3; S. Dallabrida, ERT, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khurana L, Durand E, Gary S, Otero T, Hall C, Ryan A, Evans CJ, Dallabrida S. Patient Preference for Display of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: Wording Emphasis, Question Format, and Navigation Button Placement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preference-for-display-of-electronic-patient-reported-outcomes-in-osteoarthritis-clinical-trials-wording-emphasis-question-format-and-navigation-button-placement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preference-for-display-of-electronic-patient-reported-outcomes-in-osteoarthritis-clinical-trials-wording-emphasis-question-format-and-navigation-button-placement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology