ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0198

Patient Perspectives on Janus Kinase Inhibitor Use in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis

Savia de Souza1, Andrew Bassett2, Ruth Williams2 and Elena Nikiphorou3, 1Independent, London, United Kingdom, 2King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Leiden University Medical Center & King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Protein Kinase, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have relatively recently been licensed to treat inflammatory arthritis (IA); specifically rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). They differ from biologics, often currently prescribed, by targeting a different part of the inflammatory pathway and being taken orally. The general lack of data on patient perspective on JAKi use formed the rationale for this study.

Methods: A 24-item anonymous survey, with a mix of closed and open-ended questions, was co-designed with 2 Patient Research Partners with IA. The survey was distributed online in October 2021 via patient charities and social media. Inclusion criteria were UK-based adult patients with a diagnosis of RA/PsA who are currently on a biologic/JAKi ( > 6 months) or have previously taken a JAKi. Data from completed surveys by patients who met the inclusion criteria were imported into SPSS Statistics 27 and NVivo 12 Pro to aid descriptive statistical and thematic analyses.

Results: Of the 175 surveys received, 81% were eligible for the final analysis (due to some not meeting the inclusion criteria, incomplete and duplicate surveys). See Table 1 for patient demographics.

Cross-tabulation showed 39% of JAKi patients being ‘very satisfied’ overall with their medication, compared with 25% on biologics. See Table 2 for free text response analysis with regard to overall satisfaction with arthritis medication. Seventeen patients (12%) reported stopping a JAKi; almost half of them (47%) stopped within 1-3 months. Free text response analysis showed inefficacy (10 references) and adverse effects (9 references) to be the most common reasons for stopping JAKi.

Overall awareness of JAKi reported by patients was ‘somewhat aware’ (40%), followed by ‘not aware/not very aware/not aware at all’ (33%) and ‘very aware’ (26%). The 3 most reported sources of information on JAKi (multiple options allowed) were a rheumatologist (50%), patient organisation (31%) and the internet (28%).

Patients currently on a biologic were asked if they would prefer an oral therapy instead (such as JAKi). The majority reported ‘don’t know’ (45%), followed by ‘yes’ (27%) and ‘no’ (14%). Fifty-nine additional comments were left at the end of the survey – see Table 3 for themes.

Conclusion: IA patients on JAKi were more likely to be very satisfied overall on their arthritis medication than those on biologics. The most common reasons for stopping a JAKi were inefficacy and adverse effects. Most patients have some knowledge of JAKi, mainly from their rheumatologist. Nearly half of patients on biologics were undecided as to whether they would prefer an oral therapy, with concerns over recent warnings about JAKi. However, patients currently on JAKi appreciated its short half-life and convenience.

Supporting image 1

Table 1 – Patient demographics

Supporting image 2

Table 2 – Overall satisfaction with current arthritis medication

Supporting image 3

Table 3 – Additional comments


Disclosures: S. de Souza, None; A. Bassett, None; R. Williams, None; E. Nikiphorou, Pfizer, Celltrion, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, Lilly, Fresenius.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

de Souza S, Bassett A, Williams R, Nikiphorou E. Patient Perspectives on Janus Kinase Inhibitor Use in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspectives-on-janus-kinase-inhibitor-use-in-the-treatment-of-inflammatory-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspectives-on-janus-kinase-inhibitor-use-in-the-treatment-of-inflammatory-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology