ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1250

Patient Perceptions of the National Tele-Rheumatology Program: A Mixed Methods Study

Alicia Hamblin1, Catherine Nasrallah2, Cherish Wilson3, Bernard Ng4 and gabriela Schmajuk5, 1UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 2University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, 3UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA, 4Lexington VA, University of Washington, Seattle, 5University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1248–1271) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The national shortage of rheumatology clinicians disproportionately affects over 2.7 million rural Veterans with already limited access to healthcare. To address this gap, the National Tele-Rheumatology Program (NTRP) was developed to connect Veterans with rheumatologists via telehealth. This study aimed to evaluate veteran patient satisfaction with the NTRP using a convergent mixed method analysis.

Methods: We invited a random sample of Veterans who had at least 1 rheumatology encounter via the NTRP to participate in telephone surveys. The first group completed the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ), a validated 14-item instrument assessing quality of care, interaction, and satisfaction. The second group provided qualitative feedback through brief open-ended questions about the NTRP (“What are things that you liked about the program?” and “What are things that you did not like about the program?”). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analyzed using a multi-stage thematic approach. Data were integrated through joint display analysis framed by the Healthcare Quality Framework (HQF), including domains of safety, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, and access and equity.

Results: A total of 160 patients responded to the TSQ (86.9% male, mean (SD) age 63.3 (14.7)). Responses reflected moderate to high satisfaction across all survey items (Table 1). 102 patients responded to the open-ended questions (79.4% male, mean (SD) age 63.8 (14.6)). Major themes and corresponding quotes are shown in Table 2: Veterans expressed high overall satisfaction with the NTRP, highlighting effective treatments, strong coordination, and the convenience of remote care. Many valued the program’s efficiency, safety, and time-saving benefits. However, concerns emerged around technical difficulties, limited visit duration, and the absence of physical examinations. A subset of patients also preferred in-person care, underscoring the need for a tailored approach. The joint display analysis, framed by the HQF (Table 3), revealed concordant findings from the survey and open-ended questions, though the TSQ was limited in capturing negative perceptions towards the program around safety and timeliness.

Conclusion: Overall, Veterans reported high satisfaction with the NTRP, especially in domains of quality, effectiveness, and efficiency. Moving forward, efforts should aim to streamline logistics and refine patient selection to ensure telehealth is matched to clinical need and individual preferences. These findings can help inform future telehealth program design and implementation across other specialties serving rural populations.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Tele-Medicine Satisfaction Questionnaire Scores for random sample of Veterans participating in the NTRP (N&#3f160)

Supporting image 2Table 2: Generated themes with exemplary quotes according to the Healthcare Quality Model (n=102)

Supporting image 3Table 3: Joint display analysis according to the Healthcare Quality framework


Disclosures: A. Hamblin: None; C. Nasrallah: None; C. Wilson: None; B. Ng: None; g. Schmajuk: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hamblin A, Nasrallah C, Wilson C, Ng B, Schmajuk g. Patient Perceptions of the National Tele-Rheumatology Program: A Mixed Methods Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-the-national-tele-rheumatology-program-a-mixed-methods-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-the-national-tele-rheumatology-program-a-mixed-methods-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology