ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 110

Patient Decisions Related to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and the Factors Influencing Them

W. Benjamin Nowell1, Shilpa Venkatachalam1, Erik Harden1 and Thomas Concannon2,3, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, CreakyJoints, Upper Nyack, NY, 2The RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, 3Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: arthroplasty and patient engagement, Hip, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient-engaged research can improve the safety and satisfaction outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty (joint replacement surgery). Patients are able to identify the decisions that are most important to them when undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty and the factors they view as important in making those decisions.

Methods:  Forty-nine participants were recruited from ArthritisPower Patient-Powered Research Network and CreakyJoints patient community to participate in structured one-hour discussions held via webinar during January to April 2016 to understand patient experience with joint replacement. Patients described decisions that were most important to them and the factors they used to make those decisions. Discussions were transcribed and coded to identify themes; patient decisions and factors were identified and categorized; and co-occurrence of decisions with factors was tabulated. Demographic and procedure-related characteristics were captured.

Results: Seven decisions emerged that were influenced by at least ten factors (Table). The most important decisions involved whether to have surgery, selection of surgery date, surgeon, facility, implant device, and ancillary health care professionals (HCPs) and services. Factors included current situation, expectations of having or not having surgery, professional and word-of-mouth familiarity with surgeon/HCP, procedure, services and device, and perceived value. Patients’ current situation and health status and their expectations of surgery were most commonly used to make decisions about whether and when to have surgery. Patients’ trust of and communication with doctors was the most commonly used factor when deciding on arthroplasty surgeon.

Conclusion: Arthroplasty patients are concerned about a variety of decisions. Patient-centered research should maximally address questions of importance to patients and this study is a first step in identifying and prioritizing topics that matter most to patients and the information that patients currently use to make joint replacement decisions. Table: Arthroplasty Decisions Important to Patients and the Most Common Factors Influencing Them  

Decisions Important to Patients

Most Common Factors Influencing Decisions

Surgery: Whether to have partial or total hip/knee joint replacement surgery (arthroplasty) Current life situation and health status (44%), Expectations of having surgery (11%), Expectations of NOT having surgery (11%), Information provided to patient by doctor or other HCP (11%), Alternatives to surgery that have been tried or are known about (11%)
Timing: When to have surgery Current life situation and health status (38%), Expectations of having surgery (19%), Alternatives to surgery that have been tried or are known about (19%), Expectations of NOT having surgery (8%)
Surgeon: Which surgeon will perform surgery Trust and communication with surgeon (45%), Perceived value of surgeon’s expertise (19%), Expectations of having surgery (16%), Information accessed by patient autonomously (10%)
Facility: Where surgery will be performed (e.g., geographic location, specific hospital or medical center) Information provided to patient by doctor or other HCP (28%), Trust and communication with HCP (18%), Firsthand familiarity with facility (18%), Expectations of having surgery (18%), Information accessed by patient autonomously (9%), Perceived value of facility expertise (9%)
Device: Which implant device will be installed during surgery Expectations of having surgery (39%), Information provided to patient by doctor or other HCP (18%), Perceived value of device (16%), Trust and communication with HCP (11%)
Other HCPs: Who/which other health care professionals (HCPs) besides the surgeon will be involved in care during and after surgery (e.g., anesthesiologist, physical therapist) Expectations of having surgery (30%), Trust and communication with HCP (20%), Current life situation and health status (20%), Perceived value of other HCPs (20%), Firsthand familiarity with other HCPs (10%)
Other Services: What other services will be necessary before, during or after surgery (e.g., mental health) Expectations of having surgery (71%), Trust and communication with HCP (14%), Current life situation and health status (14%)

Disclosure: W. B. Nowell, None; S. Venkatachalam, None; E. Harden, None; T. Concannon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nowell WB, Venkatachalam S, Harden E, Concannon T. Patient Decisions Related to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and the Factors Influencing Them [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-decisions-related-to-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty-and-the-factors-influencing-them/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-decisions-related-to-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty-and-the-factors-influencing-them/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology