ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 379

Pain Catastrophizing Decreases in RA Patients Starting, Adding or Switching a DMARD

Ezra Cohen1, Alyssa Wohlfahrt2, Robert R. Edwards3, Clifton Bingham III4, Marcy Bolster5, Larry W. Moreland6, Tuhina Neogi7, Kristine Phillips8 and Yvonne C. Lee9, 1Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Anesthesiology, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, 4Divisions of Rheumatology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 5Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 6Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 7Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 8Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 9Rheumatology Immunology & Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: pain, pain management and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Pain – Clinical Aspects - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   In individuals with RA, catastrophizing is associated with poor pain outcomes. It is not known whether catastrophizing can be altered by treating RA with DMARDs, or if pain can predict changes in catastrophizing associated with DMARD treatment. The objective of this analysis was to identify changes in catastrophizing associated with DMARD therapy and to examine associations between baseline pain and subsequent catastrophizing levels. We also analyzed the opposite relationship to determine if baseline catastrophizing is associated with future pain.

Methods:   We examined baseline (before DMARD initiation) and follow-up data (12-24 weeks after DMARD initiation) from the first 115 subjects in a prospective cohort of RA patients with active disease starting or switching DMARDs. Pain was measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0-10, and pain catastrophizing was measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale from 0-52. We used paired t-tests to determine if pain catastrophizing changed over 12-weeks of DMARD treatment. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association between: a) baseline pain catastrophizing as the independent variable and 12-week pain intensity as the outcome, and b) baseline pain intensity as the independent variable and 12-week pain catastrophizing as the outcome. These models controlled for age, gender, disease duration, swollen joint count and depression. In addition, baseline pain intensity was included as a covariate in the model examining the relationship between baseline catastrophizing and 12-week pain, and baseline catastrophizing was included in the model examining the relationship between baseline pain and 12-week catastrophizing.

Results:   In this cohort of RA patients, median age was 54.9 years, and 78.1% were women.  38.8% started a non-biologic DMARD, and 61.2% started a biologic DMARD. Both pain and catastrophizing decreased after 12-weeks, from 5 to 3 on a 10-pt NRS (P <0.0001) and from 16 to 10 on the 52-point Pain Catastrophizing Scale (P <0.0001). High baseline pain was associated with greater catastrophizing at 12 weeks (β=0.92, p=0.04) (Figure). Baseline catastrophizing was not associated with pain at 12 weeks (β=0.02, p=0.36).

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that after initiating a new DMARD, pain catastrophizing decreases in RA patients, suggesting that catastrophizing may have state-like properties, which can be altered by DMARD treatment. However, despite DMARD treatment, individuals with high baseline pain had higher pain catastrophizing at 12-weeks, compared to those with low baseline pain. These findings suggest that aggressive initial treatment of pain may be useful in preventing future catastrophizing.


Disclosure: E. Cohen, None; A. Wohlfahrt, None; R. R. Edwards, None; C. Bingham III, None; M. Bolster, Johnson and Johnson, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 2,RRF Amgen Fellowship Award, 9; L. W. Moreland, None; T. Neogi, None; K. Phillips, None; Y. C. Lee, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cohen E, Wohlfahrt A, Edwards RR, Bingham C III, Bolster M, Moreland LW, Neogi T, Phillips K, Lee YC. Pain Catastrophizing Decreases in RA Patients Starting, Adding or Switching a DMARD [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-catastrophizing-decreases-in-ra-patients-starting-adding-or-switching-a-dmard/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-catastrophizing-decreases-in-ra-patients-starting-adding-or-switching-a-dmard/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology