ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1590

Pain and Treatment Switching Among Patients in the CorEvitasTM Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

Joshua Baker1, J Morel Symons2, Jud C Janak3, Oksana Pugach3, Elizabeth Kohl3, Miao Yu3, Dave Webb4, Alan A Martin4, Didier Saurigny5 and Marguerite Bracher5, 1University of Pennsylvania and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, 2GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 3CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 4GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom, 5GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Disease Activity, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), pain, rheumatoid arthritis, risk factors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Abstracts: RA – Treatment I: Switching or Discontinuation of Therapies

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: For many patients with RA on targeted therapies, the chronic burden of pain leads to therapies being deemed suboptimally effective and may affect treatment decisions. Our objective was to explore the association between patient-reported pain and switching biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs.

Methods: Patients in the CorEvitas RA registry who met the following criteria were included: started a b/tsDMARD as of 1/1/2012; had ≥2 routine clinical visits; and no b/tsDMARD interruption (defined as being off treatment for >2 months). The outcome of interest was time to treatment switch to a b/tsDMARD with a different MOA. The exposure of interest was time-varying patient-reported pain measured on the visual analog scale (Pain VAS: 0–100 mm): mild (0–44 mm), moderate (45–74 mm), and severe (75–100 mm). Sociodemographics, lifestyle, disease characteristics, treatment history, and patient-reported outcomes were explored as potential confounders. Disease activity was analyzed with both time-varying Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and modified (m)CDAI (minus patient global assessment and tender joint count). Descriptive statistics stratified by baseline pain category were reported. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were reported for unadjusted and adjusted Cox hazards models with cluster-robust standard errors.

Results: Among 7806 patients, 9587 b/tsDMARD starts (Table, Panel B) were included for the following pain categories: mild (n=4126; 43%), moderate (n=2976; 31%), and severe (n=2430; 25%), missing (n=55; 1%). In patients with severe pain vs mild pain (Table, Panel A), a greater proportion were smokers (23% vs 15%); obese (52% vs 40%); and there was a higher prevalence of depression (43% vs 28%) and fibromyalgia (12% vs 3%). A higher proportion with severe pain vs mild pain reported ≥2 previous bDMARDs (50% vs 38%) and use of opioids (49% vs 18%), prednisone (39% vs 26%), and anti-depressants (33% vs 20%). The unadjusted risk of switching b/tsDMARD was ~2 times higher for severe vs mild pain (HR=1.98; 1.60–2.44; Figure). The fully adjusted risk for severe vs mild pain after accounting for confounders (HR=1.37; 1.02–1.86) was similar to the model that only included time-varying CDAI as a confounder (HR=1.35; 1.08–1.69). Compared with models that incorporated only time-varying CDAI, the risk of switching for severe pain was higher when adjusting instead for only time-varying mCDAI (HR=1.51; 1.22–1.87).

Conclusion: Patients that report greater pain are more likely to switch to a b/tsDMARD of a different MOA; an observation that remained after adjusting for confounders, including time-varying disease activity. Overall, these findings suggest that persistent pain is common in RA and influences treatment decisions, particularly a switch to a different MOA. Approaches that reduce chronic pain in this population may help reduce treatment cycling.

This GSK-funded study (214024) was sponsored by CorEvitas, LLC, with editorial support by Fishawack Indicia Ltd, funded by GSK.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Table. Descriptive characteristics of sociodemographic factors, health behaviors and characteristics, disease, and treatment characteristics at baseline, by total sample and Pain VAS groups.

a Insurance type is not mutually exclusive
b Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cut-offs for normal/underweight (under 25); overweight (25.0–29.9); and obese (30.0 and above)
c Infections include Joint/bursa, cellulitis/skin, sinusitis, Candida, diverticulitis, sepsis, pneumonia, bronchitis, gastroenteritis, meningitis/encephalitis, urinary tract, upper respiratory, tuberculosis, and other. Infections resulting in hospitalization or administration of IV antibiotics indicates serious infection.
d Prior non-biologic systemic use count does not include the current non-biologic systemic therapy, if applicable
e Prior biologics count does not include subject’s current biologic, biosimilars are not counted
f No pain and mild pain (0–44 mm), moderate pain (45–74 mm), severe pain (75–100 mm)
g The EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) computes an index value using the individual mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression responses from the EQ-5D quality-of-life instrument.
h 47 patients (55 therapy starts) had missing baseline pain

Supporting image 3

Figure. Forest plots of HR for switching b/tsDMARD with categorical Pain VAS (mild pain as a reference group) across different models.

Note: Unadjusted model: Pain VAS as only covariate, sample size=9587, number of events=980, mean follow-up time=22.9 months, median follow-up time=15 months
Model 1 – Unadjusted model: time-varying Pain VAS categories as only covariate, low Pain VAS group as a reference
Model 2.1 – Fully adjusted model: Pain VAS adjusted for time varying CDAI, age, gender, race, health insurance type, college degree or above, work status, smoking history, BMI, history of comorbidities (infections, depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, other comorbidities), number of comorbidities, duration of RA, modified HAQ, concomitant therapy, prior conventional DMARD use, prior bDMARD use, current opioid use, prednisone use, patient-reported fatigue, morning stiffness, problems with sleeping
Model 2.2 – Fully adjusted model: Pain VAS adjusted for time varying modified CDAI, age, gender, race, health insurance type, college degree or above, work status, smoking history, BMI, history of comorbidities (infections, depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, other comorbidities), number of comorbidities, duration of RA, modified HAQ, concomitant therapy, prior cDMARD use, prior bDMARD use, current opioid use, prednisone use, patient-reported fatigue, morning stiffness, problems with sleeping
Model 3.1 – CDAI adjusted model: Pain VAS adjusted for time varying CDAI
Model 3.2 – mCDAI adjusted model: Pain VAS adjusted for time varying modified CDAI.


Disclosures: J. Baker, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, CorEvitas LLC, Burns-White, LLC, RediTrex; J. Symons, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK); J. Janak, CorEvitas LLC; O. Pugach, CorEvitas LLC; E. Kohl, CorEvitas LLC; M. Yu, CorEvitas LLC; D. Webb, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK); A. Martin, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK); D. Saurigny, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK); M. Bracher, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baker J, Symons J, Janak J, Pugach O, Kohl E, Yu M, Webb D, Martin A, Saurigny D, Bracher M. Pain and Treatment Switching Among Patients in the CorEvitasTM Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-and-treatment-switching-among-patients-in-the-corevitastm-rheumatoid-arthritis-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-and-treatment-switching-among-patients-in-the-corevitastm-rheumatoid-arthritis-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology