ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 2443

Pain and Function Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Ummara Shah1, Lisa A. Mandl2, Mark P. Figgie3, Michael Alexiades4 and Susan M. Goodman2, 1Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, NYC, NY, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012

Keywords: Arthroplasty and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Rehabilitation Abstract Session

Session Type: Combined Abstract Sessions

Background/Purpose: There is little information on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).  The purposes of this study were to determine the patterns of TJA in a contemporary SLE cohort and to determine if SLE is a risk factor for worse outcomes compared with similar osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

Methods:   Patients with SLE who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty between May 2007 and June 2011 and enrolled in our institution’s arthroplasty registry were eligible for this study.  SLE cases were identified by ICD-9 code 710 and confirmed if they met 3/14 ACR criteria, were on immunosuppressant therapy, or had the diagnosis confirmed by a rheumatologist. Validated SLE cases were matched to two OA controls by age (+/- 2.5 years), gender, procedure, and presence of osteonecrosis (ON).  ON was confirmed in cases and controls by pathology or radiology review.  Pain and function were measured by WOMAC and the validated Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS). Administrative and self-report data were collected at baseline and 2 years. Standard univariate comparisons were performed to compare SLE with matched OA cases at baseline and at two years post-op.  Multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between diagnosis, presence of ON, and WOMAC pain and function at 2 years.  TKA patients’ pre-operative expectations were measured with the validated TKR Expectations Survey.

Results: 101 SLE cases were identified, 56 hip (THR) and 45 knee (TKR).  5 cases could only be matched to 1 control.  Pre-operatively, SLE THR cases had statistically and clinically significantly worse WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function than matched OA hips, (see Table).  Renal failure, hypertension, pulmonary, and valvular disease were also more common in SLE THA patients.  Both SLE THA and TKA has statistically significantly worse SF-36 PCS pre-operatively, and, despite significant improvements, they remained statistically significantly worse compared to matched OA controls post-operatively. Two-years post-operatively, there were no differences in pain and function scores between SLE and OA controls.  In multivariate regressions controlling for type of surgery, disease type, and ON, neither SLE nor ON predicted worse pain or function at 2 years.  There were no differences in expectations of surgery between SLE TKA and OA TKA.

Conclusion: SLE THA and TKA patients have similar pain and functional outcomes at 2 years compared with matched OA controls.   Although PCS scores improved after arthroplasty, they remained lower in SLE patients than OA controls.  To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that neither SLE nor ON should be considered risk factors for poor post-operative outcomes.

Table

SLE  THA

+/- SD

n= 56

OA THA

+/- SD

n=108

p-value

SLE TKA

+/- SD

n= 45

OA TKA

+/- SD

n=89

p-value

Age

54.4 +/-14.4

54.8+/-14.2

0.89

62.4+/-10.1

62.6+/-9.4

0.9

Female

50 (89.3%)

95 (88.8%)

0.9

40 (90.9)

83 (93.3)

0.6

ON*

18 (32.1%)

29 (26.9%)

0.5

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.2%)

0.55

WOMAC Baseline pain

42.9 +/-19.7

53 +/-17.8

0.011

42.6 +/-17.3

49.4 +/-15.0

0.073

WOMAC pain2 yr

90.0 +/-13.2

92.4+/-13.8

0.5

81.8+/-15.7

90.7+/-13.4

0.06

WOMAC Baseline function

39.1 +/-20.7

48.5 +/-20

0.04

42.1 +/-17

47.5 +/-17.3

0.21

WOMAC function p2 yr

87.1+/-17

91.5+/-15.1

0.33

79.7+/-17.7

87.0+/-16.0

0.2

ED-5Q scale Baseline

59.8+/-17.0

67.9+/-20.6

0.06

69.7+/-18.8

73.7+/-15.0

0.3

ED-5Q 2 yrs

69.9+/-16.8

84.0+/-12.9

0.002

82.2+/-9.7

81.5+/-17.0

0.88

SF-36 PCS Baseline

24.5+/-6.5

31.9+/-8.8

0.0001

27.3+/-6.7

33.7+/-8.1

0.0006

SF-36 PCS p2 yr

39..0+/-12.4

50.1+/-10.6

0.001

38.0+/-5.5

48.4+/-9.8

0.0007

LEAS Baseline

8.1 +/-3.1

9.4+/-3.1

0.034

8.4+/-2.3

9.6+/-3.1

0.09

LEAS 2 yr

10.4+/-3.9

12.2+/-2.9

0.06

9.9+/-2.5

11.6+/-2.9

0.05

Elix-hauser Co-morbidities

Valvular disease

10 (17.9%)

2 (1.9%)

0.0004

4(8.9%)

3 (3.4%)

0.22

Renal failure

8(14.3%)

1 (0.9%)

0.0009

5(11.1%)

2 (2.2%)

0.04

Hypertension

29 (51.8%)

32 (29.6%)

0.007

25 (55.6%)

53 (59.6%)

0.7

Pulmonary circulation disease

3 (5.4%)

0 (0.0%)

0.04

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

——

corticosteroids

9 (16.1%)

0 (0.0%)

—-

3 (6.7%)

0 (0.0%)

—–

immunosuppressants

40 (71.4%)

0 (0.0%)

—

34 (75.6%)

0 (0.0%)

—–

* 5 patients have no controls so prevalence of ON is different  between SLE and OA; this imbalance was addressed by including ON in the multivariate regressions


Disclosure:

U. Shah,
None;

L. A. Mandl,
None;

M. P. Figgie,
None;

M. Alexiades,
None;

S. M. Goodman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-and-function-outcomes-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology