ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2443

Pain and Function Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Ummara Shah1, Lisa A. Mandl2, Mark P. Figgie3, Michael Alexiades4 and Susan M. Goodman2, 1Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, NYC, NY, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Arthroplasty and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Rehabilitation Abstract Session

Session Type: Combined Abstract Sessions

Background/Purpose: There is little information on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).  The purposes of this study were to determine the patterns of TJA in a contemporary SLE cohort and to determine if SLE is a risk factor for worse outcomes compared with similar osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

Methods:   Patients with SLE who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty between May 2007 and June 2011 and enrolled in our institution’s arthroplasty registry were eligible for this study.  SLE cases were identified by ICD-9 code 710 and confirmed if they met 3/14 ACR criteria, were on immunosuppressant therapy, or had the diagnosis confirmed by a rheumatologist. Validated SLE cases were matched to two OA controls by age (+/- 2.5 years), gender, procedure, and presence of osteonecrosis (ON).  ON was confirmed in cases and controls by pathology or radiology review.  Pain and function were measured by WOMAC and the validated Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS). Administrative and self-report data were collected at baseline and 2 years. Standard univariate comparisons were performed to compare SLE with matched OA cases at baseline and at two years post-op.  Multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between diagnosis, presence of ON, and WOMAC pain and function at 2 years.  TKA patients’ pre-operative expectations were measured with the validated TKR Expectations Survey.

Results: 101 SLE cases were identified, 56 hip (THR) and 45 knee (TKR).  5 cases could only be matched to 1 control.  Pre-operatively, SLE THR cases had statistically and clinically significantly worse WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function than matched OA hips, (see Table).  Renal failure, hypertension, pulmonary, and valvular disease were also more common in SLE THA patients.  Both SLE THA and TKA has statistically significantly worse SF-36 PCS pre-operatively, and, despite significant improvements, they remained statistically significantly worse compared to matched OA controls post-operatively. Two-years post-operatively, there were no differences in pain and function scores between SLE and OA controls.  In multivariate regressions controlling for type of surgery, disease type, and ON, neither SLE nor ON predicted worse pain or function at 2 years.  There were no differences in expectations of surgery between SLE TKA and OA TKA.

Conclusion: SLE THA and TKA patients have similar pain and functional outcomes at 2 years compared with matched OA controls.   Although PCS scores improved after arthroplasty, they remained lower in SLE patients than OA controls.  To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that neither SLE nor ON should be considered risk factors for poor post-operative outcomes.

Table

SLE  THA

+/- SD

n= 56

OA THA

+/- SD

n=108

p-value

SLE TKA

+/- SD

n= 45

OA TKA

+/- SD

n=89

p-value

Age

54.4 +/-14.4

54.8+/-14.2

0.89

62.4+/-10.1

62.6+/-9.4

0.9

Female

50 (89.3%)

95 (88.8%)

0.9

40 (90.9)

83 (93.3)

0.6

ON*

18 (32.1%)

29 (26.9%)

0.5

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.2%)

0.55

WOMAC Baseline pain

42.9 +/-19.7

53 +/-17.8

0.011

42.6 +/-17.3

49.4 +/-15.0

0.073

WOMAC pain2 yr

90.0 +/-13.2

92.4+/-13.8

0.5

81.8+/-15.7

90.7+/-13.4

0.06

WOMAC Baseline function

39.1 +/-20.7

48.5 +/-20

0.04

42.1 +/-17

47.5 +/-17.3

0.21

WOMAC function p2 yr

87.1+/-17

91.5+/-15.1

0.33

79.7+/-17.7

87.0+/-16.0

0.2

ED-5Q scale Baseline

59.8+/-17.0

67.9+/-20.6

0.06

69.7+/-18.8

73.7+/-15.0

0.3

ED-5Q 2 yrs

69.9+/-16.8

84.0+/-12.9

0.002

82.2+/-9.7

81.5+/-17.0

0.88

SF-36 PCS Baseline

24.5+/-6.5

31.9+/-8.8

0.0001

27.3+/-6.7

33.7+/-8.1

0.0006

SF-36 PCS p2 yr

39..0+/-12.4

50.1+/-10.6

0.001

38.0+/-5.5

48.4+/-9.8

0.0007

LEAS Baseline

8.1 +/-3.1

9.4+/-3.1

0.034

8.4+/-2.3

9.6+/-3.1

0.09

LEAS 2 yr

10.4+/-3.9

12.2+/-2.9

0.06

9.9+/-2.5

11.6+/-2.9

0.05

Elix-hauser Co-morbidities

Valvular disease

10 (17.9%)

2 (1.9%)

0.0004

4(8.9%)

3 (3.4%)

0.22

Renal failure

8(14.3%)

1 (0.9%)

0.0009

5(11.1%)

2 (2.2%)

0.04

Hypertension

29 (51.8%)

32 (29.6%)

0.007

25 (55.6%)

53 (59.6%)

0.7

Pulmonary circulation disease

3 (5.4%)

0 (0.0%)

0.04

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

——

corticosteroids

9 (16.1%)

0 (0.0%)

—-

3 (6.7%)

0 (0.0%)

—–

immunosuppressants

40 (71.4%)

0 (0.0%)

—

34 (75.6%)

0 (0.0%)

—–

* 5 patients have no controls so prevalence of ON is different  between SLE and OA; this imbalance was addressed by including ON in the multivariate regressions


Disclosure:

U. Shah,
None;

L. A. Mandl,
None;

M. P. Figgie,
None;

M. Alexiades,
None;

S. M. Goodman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pain-and-function-outcomes-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology