ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1420

Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Monotherapy with Etanercept, Adalimumab, or Janus Kinase Inhibitors

Dimitrios Pappas1, Jacqueline O'Brien2, Mike Kelleman2, Lin Guo2, Ying Shan2, Joshua Baker3, Greg Kricorian4, Scott Stryker5 and David Collier6, 1Corrona Research Foundation; CorEvitas, LLC, Albany, NY, 2CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 3University of Pennsylvania and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, 4Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 5Amgen Inc., San Francisco, CA, 6Amgen Inc., Simi Valley, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) often are used as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of these therapies when used as monotherapy. In this real-world study, we evaluated first-line use of etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) as monotherapies to gain insights into drug persistency and effectiveness in a population of monotherapy initiators.

Methods: Data were obtained from the prospective, multicenter, observational, disease-based CorEvitas RA Registry. The study population included b/tsDMARD-naive patients who initiated first-line ETN, ADA, or JAKis as monotherapy. We report descriptive statistics at baseline, persistency on therapy, details on patterns of drug switching, and effectiveness outcomes presented as unadjusted mean change and results from linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models adjusted for covariates that were imbalanced (standardized difference >0.1) at baseline. Outcomes were evaluated at 6 and 12 months.

Results: There were 550 initiators of first-line b/tsDMARD monotherapy with a follow-up visit (ETN: 218; ADA: 212; JAKis: 120). First-line JAKi initiators were older and had longer disease duration than ETN and ADA initiators (Table 1). Initiators of ETN and JAKis had slightly higher Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at baseline than initiators of ADA (Table 1). At 6 months, 64.5%, 65.4%, and 62.4% of initiators remained on ETN, ADA, and JAKis, respectively. At 12 months, 50.7%, 57.3%, and 48.1% remained on ETN, ADA, and JAKis, respectively. At 6 months, 9.6% of ETN initiators, 12.0% of ADA initiators, and 15.4% of JAKi initiators switched to another b/tsDMARD. At 12 months, 22.8% of ETN initiators, 25.2% of ADA initiators, and 20.8% of JAKi initiators switched to another b/tsDMARD. Unadjusted changes in disease activity measures and patient-reported outcomes were generally similar among groups at 6 and 12 months (Table 2). After adjusting for baseline covariates, differences in changes in disease activity measures and patient-reported outcomes between groups were not significant (Figure 1). Regression coefficients (95% CI) for adjusted change in CDAI, patient pain, and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire in ADA initiators relative to ETN initiators were −0.84 (−3.31, 1.62), 0.75 (−5.09, 6.60), and −0.03 (−0.11, 0.05) at 6 months. Regression coefficients for these measures in JAKi initiators relative to ETN initiators were 0.67 (−2.22, 3.56), 4.32 (−2.52, 11.15), and 0.04 (−0.05, 0.13). Odds ratios (95% CI) for achievement of low disease activity at 6 months relative to ETN initiators (after adjusting for imbalanced baseline covariates) were 0.88 (0.49, 1.59) for ADA initiators and 1.04 (0.50, 2.16) for JAKi initiators. Adjusted results were similar at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: In a population of patients with RA initiating their first b/tsDMARD as monotherapy, we did not observe differences in 6- and 12-month effectiveness outcomes between ETN, ADA, and JAKi monotherapy initiators after adjusting for baseline differences between groups.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: D. Pappas, CorEvitas, LLC, Corrona Research Foundation, AbbVie, Novartis, Roche Hellas, Sanofi; J. O'Brien, CorEvitas, LLC.; M. Kelleman, CorEvitas, LLC.; L. Guo, CorEvitas, LLC.; Y. Shan, CorEvitas, LLC.; J. Baker, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, CorEvitas LLC, Burns-White, LLC, RediTrex; G. Kricorian, Amgen; S. Stryker, Amgen; D. Collier, Amgen.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pappas D, O'Brien J, Kelleman M, Guo L, Shan Y, Baker J, Kricorian G, Stryker S, Collier D. Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Monotherapy with Etanercept, Adalimumab, or Janus Kinase Inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-monotherapy-with-etanercept-adalimumab-or-janus-kinase-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-monotherapy-with-etanercept-adalimumab-or-janus-kinase-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology