ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 972

Outcome of the Scleroderma Population “at Risk” to Develop Pulmonary Hypertension in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma Cohort Study

Vivien Hsu1, Virginia D. Steen2 and PHAROS Investigators, 1Rheumatology, RWJ Med Schl Scleroderma Prog, New Brunswick, NJ, 2Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: outcomes, pulmonary fibrosis and scleroderma, Pulmonary Involvement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics I

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

ABSTRACT:

Background/Purpose: We investigated predictors of outcome, including mortality and cardiopulmonary hospitalizations in the Òat riskÓ group for pulmonary hypertension in PHAROS, a prospective longitudinal cohort study to understand the natural history of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). 

Methods: The Òat riskÓ population for PH was defined by the following entry criteria: echocardiogram (echo) systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) >40mmHg, or diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco) <55% predicted or ratio of % forced vital capacity (FVC) /%DLco >1.6 measured by pulmonary function testing (PFT) (1), were followed annually between 2005 and 2015. The population was stratified into 2 groups: those who developed PH, confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC), and those who remained Òat riskÓ.  Associations of baseline predictors with all-cause mortality and cardio-pulmonary hospitalizations were assessed using Kaplan Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, race and disease duration.

Results: In total, 266 Òat riskÓ SSc patients were followed for a median of 4 years (range 0.4-8.5 years). The median overall survival was 84.6% at 5 years and nearly 80% at 8.5 years.  Thirty four patients Òat riskÓ developed PH and 232 remained Òat riskÓ.  Though median survival was similar in both groups, 45% deaths in the Òat riskÓ group were due to cardio-pulmonary complications versus 70% in the PH group.  In the Òat riskÓ group (Table 1), lower risk of mortality was significantly associated with female sex, higher %DLCO, and no exercise oxygen desaturation, whereas higher mortality risk was significantly associated with anemia, higher UCSD scores, and presence of pericardial effusion. Moreover, higher UCSD scores and presence of pericardial effusion were associated with elevated risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations. Stratified analysis showed that PH patients with DLCO<50% had higher risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations as compared to other groups (figure 1). No other significant differences were observed in the associations of predictors with cardiopulmonary hospitalization risk comparing PH and Òat-riskÓ groups.Ó .

Conclusion:  This is one of the largest prospective study of SSc patients Òat riskÓ for PH. Though survival was better than those with incident PH (2, 3), male sex, low %DLCO, exercise oxygen desaturation and pericardial effusion, were similarly associated with worse outcomes.

Table 1: Predictors of overall mortality and cardiopulmonary hospitalizations in the Òat-riskÓ group,       N=232

Overall Mortality

 Predictors

Crude model

Adjusted model*

Hazard ratio (95%CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
 Female vs. Male 0.23 (0.10, 0.52) 0.0004 0.19 (0.08,0.49) 0.0005
 %DLCO** 0.59 (0.47, 0.75) <0.0001 0.61 (0.47, 0.79) 0.0002
 Exercise oxygen   desaturation*** 0.04 (0.01, 0.14) <0.001 0.07 (0.02, 0.26) <0.0001
 Pericardial effusion (yes vs. no) 5.79 (2.38, 14.07) 0.0001 7.79 (2.88, 21.05) <0.0001
 Hemoglobin <11.2 2.71 (1.16, 6.35) 0.0216 2.71 (1.02, 7.17) 0.0451
 UCSD scores  (>2 vs. ²2) 2.25 (0.92, 5.46) 0.0746 2.66 (1.03, 6.89) 0.044

Cardiopulmonary hospitalizations

Crude model

Adjusted model*

UCSD scores  (>2 vs. ²2) 6.93 (0.85,56.36) 0.0701 6.20 (0.74, 52.22) 0.0934
%DLCO** 0.64 (0.43, 0.96) 0.0317 0.63 (0.04, 0.99) 0.0441
Pericardial effusion (yes vs. no) 4.38 (0.08, 23.92) 0.0884 6.77 (1.06, 43.17) 0.0432

* Adjusted for age, gender, race (white versus non-white) and disease duration from Raynaud and non-Raynaud symptoms.  **  HRs per 10% increase *** HRs per 40% increase Figure 1:


Disclosure: V. Hsu, None; V. D. Steen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hsu V, Steen VD. Outcome of the Scleroderma Population “at Risk” to Develop Pulmonary Hypertension in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcome-of-the-scleroderma-population-at-risk-to-develop-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/outcome-of-the-scleroderma-population-at-risk-to-develop-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology