ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1084

Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Diagnosed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Are Not Increased in Patients with Gout

Karla Miller1, grant Cannon1, Kyle Register2, Nadia Grant2 and Naomi Schlesinger2, 1University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT, 2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bone density, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), gout, osteopenia, osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Controversy exists surrounding the association of gout with osteoporosis diagnosis or incident fragility fractures.  Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis and osteopenia. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia by DXA in patients with and without gout in in a large academic health care system.

Methods: All patients having DXA scans between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2023, were identified as “Gout” or “No Gout” based on the presence or absence of one or more Gout ICD-10 codes before DXA (Figure 1).  For each patient, DXA T-score results at either the total hip, femoral neck, spine, and/or radius on the first DXA were classified as normal bone density, osteopenia, or osteoporosis based on World Health Organization criteria.   Demographic and clinical features evaluated were age at DXA, body mass index (BMI), Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI) at DXA, glucocorticoid use, self-reported gender, race, and smoking.  Glucocorticoid exposure was defined as ≥90 days of glucocorticoid with an average daily dose of ≥5 mg prednisone equivalent per day prior to and/or active prescription at the time of DXA to simulate the glucocorticoid risk used in FRAX.  A subpopulation analysis for patients “Meeting Screening Criteria” evaluated patients who met the age-based DXA screening criteria for females and males.  “Gout” patients were compared to “No Gout” patients using logistical regression with crude and adjusted odds ratios reported.

Results: Of the 21,068 eligible first DXA studies performed, there were 592 “Gout” and 20,476 “No Gout” patients, and in the screening population subgroup, there were 387 “Gout” and 12,643 “No Gout” patients (Figure 1).  Gout patients were older, more frequently male, predominantly white with small differences in race distribution, had higher BMI, higher CCI, higher glucocorticoid use, and less osteoporosis and osteopenia in both the total population and subpopulation of “Meeting Screening Criteria” (Table 1).   Gout in the total population was associated with significantly less combined osteoporosis/osteopenia in the crude analyses (OR 0.72, p-value < 0.001) but was no longer significant when adjusted for age, gender, race, smoking status, BMI, CCI, and glucocorticoid exposure (Table 2).  Gout in the “Meeting Screening Criteria” subpopulation was associated with significantly less osteoporosis (OR 0.76, p-value 0.26) and combined osteoporosis/osteopenia (OR 0.70, p-value 0.004) in crude analyses, but differences were no longer significant in the adjusted analyses (Table 2).

Conclusion: This is the first study to use DXA scans to diagnose osteoporosis in gout patients. In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that the diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, using DXA scans, was not increased in patients with gout in our full population or those “Meeting Screening Criteria.”  In gout patients, higher comorbidities such as CCI score and glucocorticoid use could be associated with osteoporosis, but the association might be mitigated in part by higher BMI in this population. 

Supporting image 1

Patient Selection

Supporting image 2

Demographic and clinical information on patients with and without gout at time of DXA

Supporting image 3

Crude and Adjusted Odds Ratios for Association of Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Combined Osteoporosis/Osteopenia at time of DXA In Patients with and without Gout.


Disclosures: K. Miller: None; g. Cannon: None; K. Register: None; N. Grant: None; N. Schlesinger: arthrosi, 1, horizon, 1, Novartis, 1, olatec, 1, 2, ptotalix, 1, 2, shanton, 1, sobi, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Miller K, Cannon g, Register K, Grant N, Schlesinger N. Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Diagnosed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Are Not Increased in Patients with Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/osteoporosis-and-osteopenia-diagnosed-by-dual-energy-x-ray-absorptiometry-are-not-increased-in-patients-with-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/osteoporosis-and-osteopenia-diagnosed-by-dual-energy-x-ray-absorptiometry-are-not-increased-in-patients-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology