ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 342

Optimizing the Dataset to Collect from Patients to Accurately Predict Their Status Prior to the Clinic Visit

Eric Newman1, Elizabeth Thomas2, Andrea Berger3 and H. Lester Kirchner3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 2Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 3Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: data collection, phenotypes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Understanding a patient’s status before entering the exam room, or accurately tracking status between visits, is vital to creating more efficient ways to apply patient care.  We studied which patient-derived dataset resulted in the most accurate diagnosis for common clinical scenarios encountered in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management.

Methods: 3 clinical cases were created for 4 RA scenarios: Acute Flare–RA, Chronic Active–RA, Acute Flare–Not RA, and Chronic Active–Not RA.  To see which data most accurately predicted the clinical scenario, 4 datasets were developed (Figure 1): Dataset A (RAPID3), B (RAPID3 + CDAI), C (RAPID3 + CDAI + Homunculus), and D (RAPID3 + CDAI + Homunculus + Events).  CDAI included only values from previous office visits, so the dataset could be derived without physician input.  12 rheumatologists were given randomly assembled packets with 48 cases (3 cases x 4 scenarios x 4 datasets).  For each case, the rheumatologist decided which of the 4 RA scenarios the dataset represented, as well as how confident they were in their decision (10-point Likert scale). Comparisons were tested using a Generalized Estimating Equation for logistic regression. Post-hoc comparisons were tested for each incremental amount of data.

Results: Across all scenarios (Table 1), there was an increase in percent correct as more clinical data was presented (p<0.0001).  Post-hoc analysis showed improvement in % correct moving from dataset A to B (6.2% vs. 59.0%, p<0.0001) and B to C (59.0% vs. 86.1%, p<0.0001), but not C to D (86.1% vs. 89.6%, p=0.4575).  Analysis of specific scenarios showed that dataset C was optimal for Acute Flare–RA and Acute Flare–Not RA.  Dataset B was optimal for Chronic Active – RA and Chronic Active – Not RA.  Level of confidence was high (8/10) and did not vary by dataset – indicating confidence in decision making regardless of the decision.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows the optimal data set to collect from patients between visits or before a visit to accurately diagnose the common clinical scenarios that affect patients with RA.  The combination of RAPID3 (historical and current) + CDAI (historical) + pain Homunculus gave the greatest diagnostic accuracy across all clinical phenotypes. These results can inform the design of data collection systems that improve rheumatology efficiency, by empowering the rheumatologist before the visit, and driving return visits based on patient need rather than an arbitrary interval.


Disclosure: E. Newman, None; E. Thomas, None; A. Berger, None; H. L. Kirchner, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Newman E, Thomas E, Berger A, Kirchner HL. Optimizing the Dataset to Collect from Patients to Accurately Predict Their Status Prior to the Clinic Visit [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/optimizing-the-dataset-to-collect-from-patients-to-accurately-predict-their-status-prior-to-the-clinic-visit/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/optimizing-the-dataset-to-collect-from-patients-to-accurately-predict-their-status-prior-to-the-clinic-visit/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology