ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1894

Opioid Use Disorder Among Patients with Rheumatic Conditions in the All of Us Research Program: A Descriptive Analysis

Jacob Riegler1, Leah Santacroce2, Karen H. Costenbader3 and Candace Feldman4, 1Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Somerville, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Comorbidity, population studies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (1877–1913) Epidemiology & Public Health Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and in the U.S. in 2022, resulted in over 81,000 overdose deaths.1 However, little is known about the prevalence of OUD in patients with rheumatic disease (RMD). Medications for OUD (MOUD; buprenorphine, methadone, naltrexone) are known to reduce mortality in OUD, yet no study has examined the use of MOUD in patients with RMD. This study had two primary objectives: to describe the population of patients with RMD with and without OUD and to assess use of MOUD in this population.

Methods: The data source used in this study was the All of Us Research Program (version 8), a national cohort consisting of electronic medical records for > 393,000 enrolled U.S. adults. We identified those with >2 ICD-9/10 or SNOMED codes for RA, SLE, spondyloarthritis (SpA), or osteoarthritis < 2 years pre-enrollment. Patients with OUD were identified with >1 ICD 9/10 or SNOMED code for opioid dependence or abuse that occurred after the first code for RMD. Demographic characteristics (race, age at enrollment, sex at birth, insurance type), prevalent psychiatric disorders (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, borderline personality disorder, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder), Charleson comorbidity index (CCI), and acute care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations) < 1 year prior to first OUD code were compared between patients with RMD with and without OUD. We identified a subset of patients with OUD codes and no prior MOUD use at any point prior to the first OUD code and examined differences in patient characteristics between those who received MOUD vs. did not in the subsequent period.

Results: Among 37,282 patients with RMD, we identified 1,502 (4%) with OUD billing codes (Table 1). Patients with vs. without OUD were younger, had more comorbidities, had higher acute care utilization, were more likely to have Medicaid insurance, and had a higher prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses, including psychotic and mood disorders. Patients with vs. without OUD were more likely to have RA, SLE, and SpA diagnoses. MOUD was initiated in 163/1121 (14.5%) patients. Patients who received vs did not receive MOUD were younger (mean (SD) age 55.6 (12.3) p = 0.003), had fewer comorbidities (CCI (SD) 2.6 (2.6) vs 3.3 (3.1) p = 0.001) more likely to be male (42.9% vs 27.7% p < 0.001), and were more likely to have PTSD (14.1% vs 8.7% p = 0.04).

Conclusion: In this nationwide population with RMD, we found demographic, clinical and psychiatric differences among patients with RMD with vs. without OUD. General population estimates of MOUD are around 25%, which is higher than in this RMD population.1 Future research is needed to understand the barriers that exist for patients with RMD and OUD to receiving MOUD, the influence of social risk factors on development and treatment of OUD, and the role of increased screening for psychiatric disorders with comorbid OUD and RMD. References1. Dowell D, Brown S, Gyawali S, et al. Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Population Estimates — United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73(25):567-574. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7325a1

Supporting image 1Table 1. Characteristics of patients with RMD in the All of Us Research Program (version 8) by the presence of opioid use disorder


Disclosures: J. Riegler: None; L. Santacroce: None; K. Costenbader: AbbVie, 2, 5, Bain, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, 3, GSK, 2, 5; C. Feldman: American College of Rheumatology, 2, 12, Committee Member/Interim Chair, Arthritis Foundation, 5, 12, Task Force Member, Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation, 5, Harvard Pilgrim, 2, Lupus Foundation of America, 2, 12, Associate Editor, Medical-Scientific Advisory Board Member, OM1, Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Riegler J, Santacroce L, Costenbader K, Feldman C. Opioid Use Disorder Among Patients with Rheumatic Conditions in the All of Us Research Program: A Descriptive Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/opioid-use-disorder-among-patients-with-rheumatic-conditions-in-the-all-of-us-research-program-a-descriptive-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/opioid-use-disorder-among-patients-with-rheumatic-conditions-in-the-all-of-us-research-program-a-descriptive-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology