ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1694

One-Year Survival Following Single versus Double Lung Transplantation in Adults with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Harry Hurley1, Luke Benvenuto2 and Elana Bernstein3, 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Maplewood, NJ, 2Columbia University, New York, NY, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, pulmonary

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical I

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lung transplantation (LT) is a potentially life-saving treatment for patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) who have developed end-stage lung disease due to interstitial lung disease (ILD). Although double lung transplant (DLT) has been associated with better graft survival than single lung transplant (SLT) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), lungs are a scarce resource. Thus, to offer LT to a greater number of patients, transplant centers also perform SLT in patients with IPF and other forms of ILD, including SARD-ILD. However, it is unknown whether DLT confers a survival benefit over SLT in patients with SARD-ILD. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether adults with SARD-ILD have higher 1-year mortality rates after SLT than after DLT. We hypothesized that SLT would be associated with higher 1-year mortality rates than DLT among adults with SARD-ILD.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent DLT or SLT in the United States between May 4, 2005 (the date of implementation of the lung allocation score system) and December 31, 2019. Data were provided by the United Network for Organ Sharing, a non-profit organization that records data on all solid organ transplants performed in the United States. Subjects were included if they were at least 18 years of age at the time of LT, underwent a DLT or SLT during the study period, and had a diagnosis of a SARD. Subjects were excluded if they had received a heart-lung transplant, if they received a LT from a living donor, or if they had missing data on diagnosis or survival time. We modeled transplant procedure type (DLT vs. SLT) as the independent binary variable of interest in stratified Cox models where survival time was the dependent variable, adjusting for recipient, donor, and procedure factors (Table 1). We used multiple imputation to account for missing covariate data.

Results: Six-hundred six adults with SARD-ILD were transplanted during the study period and met inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) age was 54 (46-62) years; 59% were female (Table 2). The majority (76%) underwent DLT. The breakdown of SARD diagnoses is included in Table 3; a plurality (37%) had systemic sclerosis . The 1-year unadjusted mortality rate following LT per 100 person-years was 14.97 among those who underwent DLT and 17.24 among those who underwent SLT. In an unadjusted model, SLT was not associated with a relative increase in 1-year mortality compared to DLT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 1.19, p = 0.46). Likewise, in our fully adjusted model – adjusted for recipient, donor, and procedure factors – SLT was not associated with a relative increase in the 1-year mortality rate compared to DLT (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 6.57, p = 0.60).

Conclusion: Adults with SARD-ILD who underwent SLT did not have an increased risk of death at 1 year compared to those who underwent DLT. Offering SLT to appropriately selected adults with SARD-ILD who require LT is a reasonable transplant strategy and will result in a greater number of available lungs to transplant to SARD-ILD patients in need.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Recipient, donor, and procedure characteristics adjusted for in Cox regression models

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Recipient, donor, and procedure characteristics

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Proportion of participants with each systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease


Disclosures: H. Hurley: None; L. Benvenuto: None; E. Bernstein: AstraZeneca, 5, aTyr, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Cabaletta, 1, 5, Kadmon, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hurley H, Benvenuto L, Bernstein E. One-Year Survival Following Single versus Double Lung Transplantation in Adults with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/one-year-survival-following-single-versus-double-lung-transplantation-in-adults-with-systemic-autoimmune-rheumatic-disease-related-interstitial-lung-disease-a-nationwide-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/one-year-survival-following-single-versus-double-lung-transplantation-in-adults-with-systemic-autoimmune-rheumatic-disease-related-interstitial-lung-disease-a-nationwide-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology