ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1611

Off-Label Use Of Rituximab For Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Europe: Limited Use Mostly In Refractory Patients

Ronald F. van Vollenhoven1, Melinda Mild2, Andrea Doria3, T. Dörner4, Gianfranco Ferraccioli5, Frederic Houssiau6, T.W.J. Huizinga7, David A. Isenberg8, László Kovács9, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza10, Danilo Squatrito11, Alexandre Voskuyl12, Marta Mosca13, G D Sebastiani14, Murat Inanç15, Gabriella Szücs16, Søren Jacobsen17, A. Castro18 and for The IRBIS-EMA group19, 1Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Department of medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Rheumatology Unit - Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 4Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 5Division of Rheumatology, Institute of Rheumatology and Affine Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, 6Department of Rheumatology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, 7Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 8Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Building, 4th Floor, Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 9Department of Rheumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary, 10Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, BioCruces Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain, 11Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Careggi Hospital- Florence, Florence, Italy, 12Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 13Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 14Rheumatology Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Rome, Italy, 15Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 16Department of Rheumatology, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Sciences Center, Debrecen, Hungary, 17Department of Rheumatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 18Hospital Universitari de Reus, Spain, Reus, Spain, 19ClinTRID, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rituximab and treatment, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects II: Central Nervous System Manifestations, Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Rituximab (Rituxan, Mabthera; RTX) has not been approved for use in SLE, but uncontrolled observations have suggested efficacy in some patients and the medication can be used off-label in many European countries. We previously reported that based on data from the IRBIS registry and additional data from investigators, between 0.5 and 1.3% of European patients with SLE have been treated, off-label, with RTX. The objective for this study was to compare characteristics of SLE patients treated off-label with RTX to those of SLE patients treated with conventional, non-biological immunosuppressives (ISs) at the same specialty centers. 

Methods: Investigators participating in the International Registry for Biologics in SLE (IRBIS), which was initiated by the SLICC group, provided the data for this study. Data previously submitted to the IRBIS registry by 28 centers in 11 European countries were complemented with additional clinical information from the participating sites. Comparator patients had been started on any conventional IS but were not necessarily naïve for this.

Results: 175 patients were analyzed; 103 were treated off-label with RTX and 72 with a conventional IS. The most frequently used ISs were mycophenolate mofetil (43%) and azathioprine (33%). For both groups, about 90% were female, 90% were Caucasians and 85% were non-smokers. Organ manifestations leading to treatment with RTX were lupus nephritis in 58%, hematological lupus in 16%, musculoskeletal manifestations in 11%, skin disease in 6%, CNS lupus in 7%, and other manifestations in 7%. For patients started on conventional ISs the corresponding percentages were 53%, 11%, 22%, 6%, 7%, and 6%. These distributions were not statistically different. Reason for treatment initiation with RTX was mainly disease control while steroid sparing was frequently the main reason for conventional ISs. At treatment initiation mean disease duration (±SD) was 9.1±7.0 for RTX-treated patients and 4.1±6.6 for patients on ISs (p<0.0001) and mean ages were 41.2±12.5 and 36.1±11.3, respectively (p=0.007). There were significant differences between the groups for SLEDAI scores (12.2±7.0 vs. 9.4±7.0; p=0.001) and SLICC damage index (1.6±3.4 vs. 0.57±1.0, p=0.014).

Conclusion: Both RTX and conventional ISs are mostly used for lupus nephritis, and no other specific organ manifestation was more likely to be treated with RTX. However, patients started on RTX were somewhat older, had significantly longer disease duration, higher disease activity and more damage compared to patients started on conventional ISs only. These data support the view that RTX is used for selected patients with later-stage, more severe SLE.


Disclosure:

R. F. van Vollenhoven,

AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

2,

AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex,

5;

M. Mild,
None;

A. Doria,
None;

T. Dörner,
None;

G. Ferraccioli,
None;

F. Houssiau,

UCB Pharma,

2,

UCB Pharma,

5;

T. W. J. Huizinga,

TWJ Huizinga has received lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotest AG, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, Crescendo Bioscience, Nycomed, Boeringher, Takeda, and Eli Lilly,

5;

D. A. Isenberg,

I have consulted for a number of companiews including GSK, Roche, UCB and teva. I arrange for the payments offered to go a local arthritis charity .,

5;

L. Kovács,
None;

G. Ruiz-Irastorza,
None;

D. Squatrito,
None;

A. Voskuyl,
None;

M. Mosca,
None;

G. D. Sebastiani,
None;

M. Inanç,
None;

G. Szücs,
None;

S. Jacobsen,
None;

A. Castro,
None;

F. T. IRBIS-EMA group,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/off-label-use-of-rituximab-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-europe-limited-use-mostly-in-refractory-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology